Hi Sergey,
GeoTif reading is off-loaded to JAI (Java Advanced Imaging). Because of
some licensing issues you need to install the JAI jars in your local
JDK. That kind of error (Trying to get a reader from an unknown format.)
typically means that no service is available for handling geotifs. JAI
p
I am using Windows XP 32 bit.
I downloaded geotools-2.7.0-project.zip, went to demo\example\
and executed :
mvn compile
mvn install
mvn exec:java -Dexec.mainClass=org.geotools.demo.ImageLab
I tried once again, and it succeeded this time!
I think, during my latter attempt I didnot perform mvn
Hi Sergey,
I have tried right now ImageLab from 2.7.0 using the provided tif and it
worked fine for me.
Could you provide some more details on your issue?
As an instance: How are you running the ImageLab demo?
Please, let us know.
Best regards,
Daniele
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Michael Be
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Michael Bedward
wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> I just ran ImageLab using the 2.7.x branch version. It reads and
> displays that file without any problems on my system (Mac OSX).
>
> Sorry I can't suggestion anything but I'm cc-ing this to Simone and
> Daniele who maintain
Hi Sergey,
I just ran ImageLab using the 2.7.x branch version. It reads and
displays that file without any problems on my system (Mac OSX).
Sorry I can't suggestion anything but I'm cc-ing this to Simone and
Daniele who maintain the coverage module. They might be able to help
you further.
Michae
Sure,
http://www.samueltoepke.com/projects/olympianengine/public/tutorials/geotiff/files/bluemarble.tif
On 30.06.2011 18:05, Michael Bedward wrote:
> On 30 June 2011 20:08, LSA wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> what is the status of raster imaging support in geotools? Does it works
>> out of the box?
>>
On 30 June 2011 20:08, LSA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the status of raster imaging support in geotools? Does it works
> out of the box?
>
> I tried both geotools 2.6.3 and 2.7.0 on bluemarble.tif, and I got this
> every time:
> Trying to get a reader from an unknown format.
>
Sorry - not sure what'
