As some of you might know already, the U.S. just joined the new Mercury
Convention, a treaty that Henrik and Noelle Selin have single-handedly
placed in the public consciousness of many of us through their writings!
Below is a note that I sent to another list that seeks to explain how the
heck we actually joined something that's both international and
environmental! wil

 

Dr. Wil Burns, Associate Director

Master of Science, Energy Policy & Climate Program

Johns Hopkins University

1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20036

650.281.9126 (Mobile)

202.452.8713 (Fax)

http://energy.jhu.edu

 

Skype ID: Wil.Burns

Blog: Teaching Climate/Energy Law & Policy,
<http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org/> http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org

 

From: Association for Environmental Studies and Sciences
[mailto:a...@listserv.ursinus.edu] On Behalf Of Wil Burns
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 10:49 AM
To: a...@listserv.ursinus.edu
Subject: [AESS_LIST] Minamata Convention: U.S. in the Lead!

 

OK, here's a rare contemporary event that has to be celebrated. The U.S. is
the FIRST country to become a party to a new international environmental
convention,  the Minamata Convention on Mercury
(http://www.mercuryconvention.org/Convention/tabid/3426/Default.aspx),
which, inter alia, bans new mercury mines, calls for phasing out current
ones, and seeks to limit mercury air emissions. The convention is slated to
come into force ninety days after the deposit of the fiftieth instrument of
ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, which most project will
take about three years.

 

You can view the State Department press release here:
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/11/217295.htm

 

Now you may be asking yourself, how could the administration possibly have
gotten such an agreement through the Senate's ratification process given its
almost visceral antipathy over the past few decades to international
agreements, and more specifically, environmental agreements? The answer is
that the President "accepted" the convention via a " sole executive
agreement," which does not require Senate ratification. In a nutshell, the
agreement has been classified by the President as not being a "treaty."
Moreover, a sole executive agreement doesn't even require a joint resolution
of Congress, as does a joint Congressional-Executive agreement. There is no
express constitutional provision that provides for such agreements; the
authority has been carved out by Presidents throughout our history, and
while challenged by Congress from time to time, it has never been able to
pass legislation to rein the practice in, other than now requiring notice
within 20 days under the Case Act.

 

In this case, the President's authority for joining the Mercury Convention
without submitting it for Senate ratification, where it assuredly would have
met its death, is this provision of the U.S. State Department's Foreign
Affairs Manual, Volume 11 outlining one of the circumstances under which
sole executive agreements can be enter into:

 

11 FAM 723.2-2(B) Agreements Pursuant to Legislation (CT:POL-48; 09-25-2006)

 

The President may conclude an international agreement on the basis of
existing legislation, or subject to legislation to be adopted by the
Congress, or upon the failure of Congress to adopt a disapproving joint or
concurrent resolution within designated time periods.

 

As you can see in the State Department press release above, the
Administration is arguing that Minamata is essentially an embodiment of
current U.S. law. Now if we could just make this argument in terms of some
other treaties that many of us probably would like to see ratified by the
United States :) 

 

It will be interesting to see domestic reactions to this decision.

 

wil

 

 

Dr. Wil Burns, President, AESS

Associate Director, Master of Science, Energy Policy & Climate Program

Johns Hopkins University

1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20036

650.281.9126 (Mobile)

202.452.8713 (Fax)

http://energy.jhu.edu

 

Skype ID: Wil.Burns

Blog: Teaching Climate/Energy Law & Policy,
http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org <http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org/> 

 

 

  _____  

To unsubscribe from the AESS list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ursinus.edu:88/scripts/wa.exe?TICKET=NzM1MjA5IHdpbGxpYW1jZ2
J1cm5zQENPTUNBU1QuTkVUIEFFU1MgIIWdFM1DPaAK
<https://listserv.ursinus.edu:88/scripts/wa.exe?TICKET=NzM1MjA5IHdpbGxpYW1jZ
2J1cm5zQENPTUNBU1QuTkVUIEFFU1MgIIWdFM1DPaAK&c=SIGNOFF> &c=SIGNOFF 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to gep-ed+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to