I think some on this list may find the following short piece in Nature Climate 
Change of interest, as it raises questions about the degree to which experience 
with weather/climate anomalies/extremes is likely to encourage futher public 
acceptance of the reality of human-caused climate change.  It employs statewide 
measured temperature deviations during the abnormally warm 2012 Winter, as 
opposed to "perceptions" of abnormal weather (as used in many studies), and 
finds that they predict public awareness of the warmer-than-average witnter but 
NOT attributing it to global warming.

I'm providing the NCC abstract and ref.  A pdf for it is available for 
downloading on my ResearchGate page (although I assume you need to be 
registered on RG--which is easy to do):  
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Riley_Dunlap
 
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n12/full/nclimate2443.html

The impacts of temperature anomalies and political orientation on perceived 
winter warming 

Nature Climate ChangeVolume: 4 (Dec. 2014):1077-1081.Pages:
DOI:  doi:10.1038/nclimate2443

Abstract:  Although perceptions of common weather phenomena moderately align 
with instrumental measurements of such phenomena, the evidence that weather or 
climatic conditions influence beliefs about anthropogenic climate change is 
mixed. This study addresses both foci, which are important to scholars who 
investigate human–environment interactions and observers who expect greater 
exposure to weather or climate extremes to translate into stronger support for 
climate change adaptive measures and mitigative policies. We analyse the extent 
to which state-level winter temperature anomalies influence the likelihood of 
perceiving local winter temperatures to be warmer than usual and attributing 
these warmer temperatures mainly to global warming. We show that actual 
temperature anomalies influence perceived warming but not attribution of such 
warmer-than-usual winter temperatures to global warming. Rather, the latter is 
influenced more by perceived scientific agreement; beliefs about the current 
onset, human cause, threat and seriousness of global warming; and political 
orientation. This is not surprising given the politicization of climate science 
and political polarization on climate change beliefs in recent years. These 
results suggest that personal experience with weather or climate variability 
may help cultivate support for adaptive measures, but it may not increase 
support for mitigation policies.

Riley E. Dunlap
Regents Professor of Sociology and
Laurence L. and Georgia Ina Dresser Professor
Department of Sociology
Oklahoma State University
Stillwater, OK  74078
405-744-6108

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to gep-ed+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to