gt;
> Blog: Teaching Climate/Energy Law & Policy,
> http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org
>
>
>
> *From:* craig harris [mailto:harr...@msu.edu]
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 02, 2014 12:33 PM
> *To:* harri...@sd-institute.org; williamcgbu...@comcast.net
> *Subject:* RE: [ge
: Wil.Burns
Blog: Teaching Climate/Energy Law & Policy,
<http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org/> http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org
From: craig harris [mailto:harr...@msu.edu]
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 12:33 PM
To: harri...@sd-institute.org; williamcgbu...@comcast.net
Subject: RE: [gep
AM
To: williamcgbu...@comcast.net; GEPED
Subject: RE: [gep-ed] spying on climate change
Wil:
I would agree. While we and our contributors only looked primarily at the US
innovation system and its historical effects (we need to do more research on
innovation in Europe), geoengineering would be a 'n
rns"
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:28 PM
To: harri...@sd-institute.org, steinb...@g.hmc.edu, "GEPED"
Subject: RE: [gep-ed] spying on climate change
The increasingly loud drumbeats for consideration of climate geoengineering
may prove to be another manifestation of
roups.com] On Behalf Of
NeilE. Harrison
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 7:11 PM
To: steinb...@g.hmc.edu; GEPED
Subject: re: [gep-ed] spying on climate change
John Mikler and I did not consider this application of technological
innovation to climate change mitigation in our new edited book
John Mikler and I did not consider this application of technological
innovation to climate change mitigation in our new edited book due out next
month from Palgrave Macmillan titled Climate Innovation: Liberal Capitalism
and Climate Change. Climate innovation for us is 'technological innovation
