RE: Ongoing issue -- responding to 'skeptics'

2009-07-04 Thread Alcock, Frank
I'm enjoying the thread and hope it continues. Per the Krugman editorial, I'd love to hear some reactions. IMHO, I think it appeals to a narrowing portion of the American electorate while generating a dismissive reaction (as well as a few guffaws) from key constituencies that are on the fence

RE: Ongoing issue -- responding to 'skeptics'

2009-07-04 Thread Dr. Wil Burns
Hi Frank, I actually didn't find Krugman's piece as so much smug as extremely angry, and I have to say it's exactly how I feel on this issue, especially when I watch my six-year old playing in the back yard, or I travel to a small island state, and despair over the world we're leaving them to

RE: Ongoing issue -- responding to 'skeptics'

2009-07-04 Thread VanDeveer, Stacy
I agree with Wil on this one. Krugman's anger and contempt are not aimed all all citizens who are skeptical, but squarely at Republicans in Congress -- elected in theory to represent people's interests. Yes, some are representing shorter term economic interests of their districts. But most,

Re: Ongoing issue -- responding to 'skeptics'

2009-07-04 Thread Deb Ranjan Sinha (Gmail)
Reading this debate, I was reminded again of an excellent article I read back in March on Freeman Dyson (see below). I, personally, have always thought of myself as a skeptic - not of global warming but its global and local effects. I often find my skepticism scary, given the fact that I am

Re: Ongoing issue -- responding to 'skeptics'

2009-07-04 Thread rldavis
As a natural scientist, I wanted to weigh in on this. The key for me was the predictive and explanatory power of global warming theory. This is the strength of any successful scientific hypothesis. So many observed phenomena are explained by the theory that it becomes very, very likely that it is

Re: Ongoing issue -- responding to 'skeptics'

2009-07-04 Thread Simon Dalby
Folks: A slightly different take picking up from Larry Davis' post and thinking through framing rather than anger ... Science doesn't explain everything, and the huge problem with framing climate change as an either or, right wrong matter is precisely that it pretends science is something it

Re: Ongoing issue -- responding to 'skeptics'

2009-07-04 Thread DG Webster
To add to some of the threads above... In all this talk about framing, it's important to remember the difference between the psychological term and how it's used by political scientists. Originally, framing referred to the set of stereotypes that an individual uses to interpret information and