Alan Cabrera wrote:
I'll post one.
Hey Alan,
Which tests are you about to fix - o.a.g.common.task.URLMonitorTaskTest
or o.a.g.remoting.transport.AsyncTransportTest? I'd love to see both -
I've seen more tests failed.
-Jacek
I'll post one.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dillon
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 9/12/03 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: org.apache.geronimo.common.task.URLMonitorTaskTest FAILED
Is there a patch for the test yet?
--jason
On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 08:20 PM, Jacek Laskowski
Is there a patch for the test yet?
--jason
On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 08:20 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
What os r u running?
Cygwin 1.5.3 with Win2k underneath.
.
[junit] [ERROR] TEST
org.apache.geronimo.common.task.URLMonitorTaskTest FAILED
[junit] Running
Jason Dillon wrote:
What os r u running?
Cygwin 1.5.3 with Win2k underneath.
.
[junit] [ERROR] TEST
org.apache.geronimo.common.task.URLMonitorTaskTest FAILED
[junit] Running org.apache.geronimo.common.ThrowableHandlerTest
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
Delay of 20 seems to fix it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: org.apache.geronimo.common.task.URLMonitorTaskTest FAILED
>
>
> The origina
Whats the name of the failing method?Is it the same
testEventFiring?
Siva
- Original Message -
From: "Jacek Laskowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: org.apache.geronimo.common.task.URLMonitorTa
TECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 8:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: org.apache.geronimo.common.task.URLMonitorTaskTest FAILED
>
>
> What os r u running?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 10:04 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>
What os r u running?
--jason
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 10:04 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Alan Cabrera wrote:
Odd. Turning on the logging makes the problem disappear.
I knew Geronimo would change the J2EE scene, but it's changed the way
bugs are fixed (and thus most developers' minds). J
Alan Cabrera wrote:
Odd. Turning on the logging makes the problem disappear.
I knew Geronimo would change the J2EE scene, but it's changed the way
bugs are fixed (and thus most developers' minds). Just turning on the
logging and the bug is gone :-)
Seriuosly, I'm having the same problem :-(
-Ja
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> Odd. Turning on the logging makes the problem disappear.
Well, it's a stretch, but I once saw a problem caused by a log
statement that logged "result = "+(foo = bar) instead of
"result = "+(foo == bar) so of course you got the bug only when logg
Odd. Turning on the logging makes the problem disappear.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: org.apache.geronimo.common.task.URLMonitorTaskTest FAILED
trace?
-Original Message-
From: Siva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: org.apache.geronimo.common.task.URLMonitorTaskTest FAILED
Alan,
It runs for me.Do you have the latest copy of the sources?Can you
enable the tra
Title: Message
How do
I enable the trace?
-Original Message-From: Siva
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003
1:13 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
org.apache.geronimo.common.task.URLMonitorTaskTest FAILED
Alan,
It runs for me.Do you
Title: Message
Alan,
It runs for me.Do you have the
latest copy of the sources?Can you
enable the trace in URLMonitorTask and send us the
output?
Siva
- Original Message -
From:
Alan
Cabrera
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:
14 matches
Mail list logo
