George DiceGeorge wrote:
> I agree, and also I'd like a prefix like [get_iplayer] in all the subject
> lines to make it easier to sort through my emails.
Define a folder for get_iplayer mails, and set up a filter to route mails
containing the
List-Id:
header to that folder; it's what the he
Colin wrote:
For most the expected behaviour when one gets an email from a
list is that Reply would go back to the list.
I agree,
and also I'd like a prefix like [get_iplayer]
in all the subject lines
to make it easier to sort through my emails.
[george]
__
On 26 August 2013 18:00, Roger Bell_West wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:10:11PM +0100, get_ipla...@i.lucanops.net wrote:
>>OT, I know, but this seems to happens a bit too often on this list. Can
>>the list not insert a Reply-To: header? That would mean that for many
>>people just hitting repl
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 18:00 +0100, Roger Bell_West wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:10:11PM +0100, get_ipla...@i.lucanops.net wrote:
> >OT, I know, but this seems to happens a bit too often on this list. Can
> >the list not insert a Reply-To: header? That would mean that for many
> >people just
Thanks Marshall, works like a treat!
From: "get_iplayer-requ...@lists.infradead.org"
To: get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
Sent: Monday, 26 August 2013, 17:00
Subject: get_iplayer Digest, Vol 40, Issue 16
Send get_iplayer mailing list submissions to
get_
Roger Bell_West wrote:
> Any standards-compliant email client will include a reply-to-list feature
> which acts on the RFC2369 headers present in every email message. I do not
> believe the list should encourage users of non-standard clients.
Absolutely. I think the problem is really that some
We get autogenerated monthly reminders that we're subscribed. Could the
they also include reminders of local nettiquete?
Don't top post, reply to the list not the sender, this list is not for
discussion of other software etc.
...erm, and on whether or not to change thread titles when the thre
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:10:11PM +0100, get_ipla...@i.lucanops.net wrote:
>OT, I know, but this seems to happens a bit too often on this list. Can
>the list not insert a Reply-To: header? That would mean that for many
>people just hitting reply will send it to the list, not an individual.
Which
On Sun, 2013-08-25 at 16:57 +0100, Shevek wrote:
> Please reply to the whole list, not just me! Cheers
OT, I know, but this seems to happens a bit too often on this list. Can
the list not insert a Reply-To: header? That would mean that for many
people just hitting reply will send it to the list, n
9 matches
Mail list logo
