Ah well, I'm fine with the concepts, but I wasn't getting anything to reply to.
The issue was that I was only getting digests to cut down on traffic, Now that
I've reset that and I'm getting all messages individually ... :)
Mable
- Original Message -
From: David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 10:35 +0100, Mable Syrup wrote:
The issue was that I was only getting digests to cut down on traffic,
Ah, right. Yeah, the digests are a stupid concept, and make it fairly
much impossible to do the right thing. I keep meaning to disable them
entirely.
Also, please make
Some of these posts come to me as attachments instead of text – is that a new
thing?
dwmw2’s last post arrived as ATT00159.txt along with smime.p7s and no legible
text was in the 'message' itself
___
get_iplayer mailing list
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 11:38 +0100, Andrew Moore wrote:
Some of these posts come to me as attachments instead of text – is
that a new thing?
No, that's just a bug in your mail client.
dwmw2’s last post arrived as ATT00159.txt along with smime.p7s and no
legible text was in the 'message'
And did you really just send that question *three* times? Once as HTML,
which the list will have rejected but I got my copy. A second time to me
*only*, and a *third* attempt which actually did the right thing?
Personally, I usually give up after after the *second* consecutive
failure to send an
I think that depends on your mail client. For instance, if I read
David's messages in Windows Mail under Vista on my laptop I see exactly
the same as you with the message content in an attachment, but using my
normal proprietary mail program his message is displayed correctly.
Thanks John,
Thanks John, Windows Live Mail is the only one converting the text
to attachments, yet your message arrived as a 'regular' text email
with no attachments on the same machine :-S
No biggie, it was just a 'nay' vote for attachments
That's because my message was sent as plain text (as I do
..and I got your reply twice because you're replying both to me *and* to
the list. You should normally only need to reply to the list.
Sorry, was using 'reply all' - will stop that now - thanks for pointing it out
___
get_iplayer mailing list
Sorry, was using 'reply all' - will stop that now - thanks for
pointing it out
No problem. That one was ok! :^)
Regards
John
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
On 31 August 2013 12:33, J K.Eason j...@jeason.cix.co.uk wrote:
Sorry, was using 'reply all' - will stop that now - thanks for
pointing it out
No problem. That one was ok! :^)
With gmail unfortunately there is no Reply to List, so I have to use
Reply to All, and then try and remember to
On 30/08/2013 23:10, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 13:59 +0100, Mable Syrup wrote:
I'm sure there must be something, but I can't find it. I want to
reply to different items in a thread in a manner that preserves the
threading.
I don't really understand why this is an issue.
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:25 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
On 31 August 2013 12:33, J K.Eason j...@jeason.cix.co.uk wrote:
Sorry, was using 'reply all' - will stop that now - thanks for
pointing it out
Argh, no!
Using 'reply all' is exactly the *right* thing to do.
Except in odd circumstances,
On 31 August 2013 21:34, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:25 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
...
With gmail unfortunately there is no Reply to List, so I have to use
Reply to All, and then try and remember to manually remove the one to
the sender, though I am never
On 31 August 2013 21:50, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
Whatever the rights and wrongs of how a list /should/ be setup the
fact is that many users think of a post as having come from the list,
not from an individual, and hence expect Reply to go to the list. The
proof of this is the
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:46 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
On 30/08/2013 23:10, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 13:59 +0100, Mable Syrup wrote:
I'm sure there must be something, but I can't find it. I want to
reply to different items in a thread in a manner that preserves the
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 21:50 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
I don't think it is odd, again on most of the lists I subscribe to
posters prefer not to get two copies, so Reply is the right thing to
do.
Have you actually read through the reply-to-list page that I have posted
a number of times now? I talk
On 2013/08/31 21:50, Colin Law wrote:
Note that one poster above was unhappy that he received a private copy
in addition to that from the list.
That poster might like to investigate the settings on
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/get_iplayer -
specifically Avoid duplicate copies of
On 31/08/2013 22:09, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:46 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
I'm sorry David, but I find this very offensive.
Before we continue, I would ask you to watch this video:
http://www.snotr.com/video/8285/Steve_Hughes_-_Offended
Watch it from 3:20 to 5:45.
Seems like the Beeb is getting litigatious ...
http://torrentfreak.com/major-tv-torrent-site-thebox-bz-calls-it-quits-130829/
Not good ...
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
Note that one poster above was unhappy that he received a private
copy in addition to that from the list.
I wouldn't say that I was particularly unhappy. It's just that it's the
first time I've seen a posting replying to one of my posts that was
actually sent directly to me *as well* as to the
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 15:29 -0700, Chris J Brady wrote:
Seems like the Beeb is getting litigatious ...
http://torrentfreak.com/major-tv-torrent-site-thebox-bz-calls-it-quits-130829/
“The decision to retire the site was not in response to any specific
threat
There can be little doubt that the
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 23:51 +0100, J K.Eason wrote:
That poster might like to investigate the settings on
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/get_iplayer -
specifically Avoid duplicate copies of messages.
For what it's worth, I've just looked and 'Avoid duplicate copies of
The address 'j...@jeason.cix.co.uk' is not subscribed to the list;
you are subscribed with another address.
Thus, the list software doesn't *know* that it's a duplicate.
Ah that would explain it. Thanks David. I've now changed to the correct
email address to match the one that the list
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 00:10 +0100, J K.Eason wrote:
The address 'j...@jeason.cix.co.uk' is not subscribed to the list;
you are subscribed with another address.
Thus, the list software doesn't *know* that it's a duplicate.
Ah that would explain it. Thanks David. I've now changed to the
And thus you should only get the one copy of this message; the list
shouldn't send you the second?
Correct! (I did get two copies from your previous post.)
If that's not true, I have a more complex debugging session coming
my way... :)
You can go to bed with a weight off your mind! :^))
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 23:26 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
On 31/08/2013 22:09, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:46 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
I'm sorry David, but I find this very offensive.
Before we continue, I would ask you to watch this video:
On 31/08/2013 23:48, Stuart Henderson wrote:
As David is the list owner, I think it's reasonable for him to comment
on list admin matters..
You are quite right. I was unaware of David's position as list owner and
wouldn't have challenged his entitlement to say whatever he wants.
My problem
27 matches
Mail list logo
