I have tried so hard to stay of this one, but my will has been
sapped...
On 01/03/2017 21:15, Peter S Kirk wrote:
On 28 Feb 2017 at 22:40, michael norman michael norman
wrote:
Best thing might be not to post links from the Mail which hates the BBC
to a pro BBC list. As others have said
To quote Reeves and Mortimer, "You wouldn't let it lie"!
-Original Message-
From: get_iplayer [mailto:get_iplayer-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf
Of Peter S Kirk
Sent: 01 March 2017 21:16
To: get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: BBC Licensing Expose
On 28 Fe
On 28 Feb 2017 at 22:40, michael norman michael norman
wrote:
> Best thing might be not to post links from the Mail which hates the BBC
> to a pro BBC list. As others have said the Mail is not a reliable source
> for anything.
The Mail is a reliable source for news BBC/Grun refuse to report a
gt; Thanks
> Roger
>
> -Original Message-
> From: get_iplayer [mailto:get_iplayer-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf
> Of Jim web
> Sent: 01 March 2017 09:37
> To: get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: BBC Licensing Expose
>
> In article <
hanks
Roger
-Original Message-
From: get_iplayer [mailto:get_iplayer-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf
Of Jim web
Sent: 01 March 2017 09:37
To: get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: BBC Licensing Expose
In article <25b7c43b-4278-2dc3-6dc3-03e646587...@tqvideo.co.uk>, Tony Q
In article <25b7c43b-4278-2dc3-6dc3-03e646587...@tqvideo.co.uk>, Tony
Quinn wrote:
> On 28/02/2017 22:30, CJB wrote:
> > I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled
> > email I first received from that David person. CJB.
> >
> He does come across as a truly vile indivi
On 28/02/17 22:44, Tony Quinn wrote:
On 28/02/2017 22:30, CJB wrote:
I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled
email I first received from that David person. CJB.
He does come across as a truly vile individuial, it has to be said; but
it's often the case with the
On 28/02/2017 22:30, CJB wrote:
I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled
email I first received from that David person. CJB.
He does come across as a truly vile individuial, it has to be said; but
it's often the case with the deeply "committed" left-leaning types
On 28/02/17 22:30, CJB wrote:
I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled
email I first received from that David person. CJB.
On 28/02/2017, Steve B wrote:
On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
has content
I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled
email I first received from that David person. CJB.
On 28/02/2017, Steve B wrote:
> On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
>>> has content which should be discussed.
On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
has content which should be discussed.
It is off-topic for this list, and even if it wasn't, it's not
appropriate to post links to that site.
Find it in credible news media or don't link to it at
r-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf
>> Of David Woodhouse
>> Sent: 27 February 2017 13:46
>> To: Tony Quinn ; get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
>> Subject: Re: BBC Licensing Expose
>>
>> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 13:22 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
>>>
>>> O
gt; Of David Woodhouse
> Sent: 27 February 2017 13:46
> To: Tony Quinn ; get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: BBC Licensing Expose
>
> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 13:22 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
>>
>> On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> > On M
om: get_iplayer [mailto:get_iplayer-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of
David Woodhouse
Sent: 27 February 2017 13:46
To: Tony Quinn ; get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: BBC Licensing Expose
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 13:22 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
>
> On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote
Trying to see both sides here:
1: It's David's list, so he gets to set the rules.
2: The subject is off-topic
BUT...
3: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39100048
However, the caveat here is that the BBC report refers to the Daily Mail report.
___
get_ipl
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 08:57:10AM +, Chris J Brady wrote:
> If you thought that the BBC employed th*gs to collect licence fees then you
> are right.
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4262202/BBC-s-TV-licence-bullies-exposed.html
Do you have an actual news source instead of a rab
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 13:22 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
>
> On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
> > > has content which should be discussed.
> >
> > It is off-topic for this list, and even if it wasn't, it's not
> > appropriate to post
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:42 +, jj wrote:
> > it's not appropriate to post links to that site.
> So, certain news outlets are banned from here? And who decides which
> are they? Isn't that (more than) a bit like Trump (or his henchmen)
> banning news organisations from their briefings?
Oh, come
On 27/02/2017 12:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
has content which should be discussed.
It is off-topic for this list, and even if it wasn't, it's not
appropriate to post links to that site.
Who exactly appointed you the arbiter of what is ap
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:08 +, Tony Quinn wrote:
> has content which should be discussed.
It is off-topic for this list, and even if it wasn't, it's not
appropriate to post links to that site.
Find it in credible news media or don't link to it at all.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptograp
In article <19f05185-ba77-c679-631c-9c0541950...@tqvideo.co.uk>, Tony
Quinn wrote:
> On 27/02/2017 09:16, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 08:57 +, Chris J Brady wrote:
> >> If you thought that the BBC employed th*gs to collect licence fees
> >> then you are right.
> >>
> >>
On 27/02/2017 09:16, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 08:57 +, Chris J Brady wrote:
If you thought that the BBC employed th*gs to collect licence fees
then you are right.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4262202/BBC-s-TV-licence-bull
ies-exposed.html
But seriously -
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:43:20 +0100, Peter Corlett wrote:
> Apart from those who don't have a TV Licence because they don't require
> one,
Haven't the rules recently changed from only needing a licence to watch "as
broadcast", ie a live stream, to requiring a licence to watch "on demand"
conten
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:04:41AM +, Colin Law wrote:
> A bonus of £15000 for catching 28 evaders at £145.50 (total £4074) doesn't
> sound very likely.
That's £15,000 per *year* for catching 28 evaders *per week* (total £211,848),
or about £10.30 per extra licence collected in this manner.
>
Oops, stupid boy. My excuse is that I never read anything in the Daily
Mail, and obviously didn't read this.
Colin
On 27 February 2017 at 09:39, SquarePenguin
wrote:
> On 27/02/17 09:04, Colin Law wrote:
>> A bonus of £15000 for catching 28 evaders at £145.50 (total £4074)
>> doesn't sound very
On 27/02/17 09:04, Colin Law wrote:
> A bonus of £15000 for catching 28 evaders at £145.50 (total £4074)
> doesn't sound very likely.
28 per week.
So 28 * 52 = 1456 'evaders' per year
1456 * cost of license fee (£145.50) = £211,848 per year
___
get_ip
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 08:57 +, Chris J Brady wrote:
> If you thought that the BBC employed th*gs to collect licence fees
> then you are right.
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4262202/BBC-s-TV-licence-bull
> ies-exposed.html
>
> But seriously - what's the implications for those u
A bonus of £15000 for catching 28 evaders at £145.50 (total £4074)
doesn't sound very likely.
I don't see there are any implications for anyone obeying the law.
Colin
On 27 February 2017 at 08:57, Chris J Brady wrote:
> If you thought that the BBC employed th*gs to collect licence fees then you
If you thought that the BBC employed th*gs to collect licence fees then you are
right.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4262202/BBC-s-TV-licence-bullies-exposed.html
But seriously - what's the implications for those using get_iplayer?
CJB
___
29 matches
Mail list logo
