hello
it is like most thing Ubuntu, they just have to be "different".
;-)
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:06 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 06:22:35PM +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>> Hi David,
>> > > If your distribution handles PPAs, there is little
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 06:22:35PM +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi David,
> > > If your distribution handles PPAs, there is little point, but if it
> > > does not, it could be very handy.
> > Not really. I have no idea what a PPA is so I presume that my OSes
> > don't handle them. I just
On 9 May 2017 at 16:03, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 01:56:03PM +0100, Martin Powell wrote:
> ...
>> If your distribution handles PPAs, there is little point, but if it does
>> not, it could be very handy.
>
> Not really. I have no idea what a PPA is so I
Hi David,
> > If your distribution handles PPAs, there is little point, but if it
> > does not, it could be very handy.
>
> Not really. I have no idea what a PPA is so I presume that my OSes
> don't handle them. I just regularly 'brew update;brew upgrade' on OS X
> and 'apt-get update;apt-get
> On Behalf Of David Cantrell
> Sent: 09 May 2017 16:04
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 01:56:03PM +0100, Martin Powell wrote:
>
> > Does anyone think reinstating the -u flag would be a good idea??
>
> No.
>
It seems like it's just on oversight in the documentation now then. I
always looked for
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 01:56:03PM +0100, Martin Powell wrote:
> Does anyone think reinstating the -u flag would be a good idea??
No.
> If your distribution handles PPAs, there is little point, but if it does
> not, it could be very handy.
Not really. I have no idea what a PPA is so I presume
Hi Martin,
> Does anyone think reinstating the -u flag would be a good idea??
I don't think it will happen. Presumably, it was removed to encourage
one to read the upgrade and installation notes and follow them, rather
than just assume it's all automatic?
An option that was silent unless a new
Does anyone think reinstating the -u flag would be a good idea??
If your distribution handles PPAs, there is little point, but if it does
not, it could be very handy.
I'm in the process of moving from Mint (with PPAs) to PCLinuxOS (No
PPAs) so the update would be nice.
What do other people
Hi Andy,
> Yes, the --force option is described in the recording options but it
> mentions -u which I can't see referenced anywhere else.
In 2.90, one of the old version I have here, -u is present.
update => [ 2, "update|u!", 'Config', '--update, -u',
"Update get_iplayer if a newer
> On Behalf Of Simon Morgan
> Sent: 09 May 2017 11:49
>
> Its only use seems to be in the recording options as described here...
>
>
https://github.com/get-iplayer/get_iplayer/wiki/options#recording-option
s
>
Yes, the --force option is described in the recording options but it
mentions -u
ge
> Sent: 09 May 2017 11:38
> To: get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Help text query
>
> I'm just looking through the -helplong text for GiP 3.01 and the -force
> option says that it "forces a script update if used with -u". I can't
> see any other refere
I'm just looking through the -helplong text for GiP 3.01 and the -force
option says that it "forces a script update if used with -u". I can't
see any other reference to a -u option though and specifying it just
seems to cause GiP to display some basic help information as though it's
an
12 matches
Mail list logo