Subject: Re: Spurious write permission error
>
> > Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 at 1:41 PM
> > From: "Nick Payne" <nick.pa...@internode.on.net>
> > [snip]
> > Unable to write to a directory lacking write
> permission.INFO: Command
>
t; -Original Message-
> From: Roger Bell_West [mailto:ro...@firedrake.org]
> Sent: 03 May 2016 16:04
> To: C E Macfarlane
> Subject: Re: Spurious write permission error
>
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:55:48PM +0100, C E Macfarlane wrote:
> >Tough
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:55:48PM +0100, C E Macfarlane wrote:
> From: artisticforge . [mailto:artisticfo...@gmail.com]
> > First a request. can you refrain from inserting your web page with
> > every post? it is annoying
> Tough shit. It's my standard email sig, and I'm not changing it just for
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 08:48:47AM -0500, artisticforge . wrote:
> second, I do not do "Windows". That said, any operating system should
> prevent the deletion of a file that is in use.
Indeed. However, Unix-a-likes do let you delete directory entries for
files that are in use - the file is only
gt; -Original Message-
>> From: artisticforge . [mailto:artisticfo...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 03 May 2016 12:27
>> To: c.e.macfarl...@macfh.co.uk
>> Cc: Nick Payne; get_iplayer
>> Subject: Re: Spurious write permission error
>>
>>
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 10:40:01PM +0100, C E Macfarlane wrote:
> 1)The OS - the OP was working with Windows, while all none of his
> respondents are. It might be that Windows is less forgiving of attempts by
> one process to access a file that is currently being updated by another
>
Please see below ...
www.macfh.co.uk/CEMH.html
> -Original Message-
> From: artisticforge . [mailto:artisticfo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 03 May 2016 12:27
> To: c.e.macfarl...@macfh.co.uk
> Cc: Nick Payne; get_iplayer
> Subject: Re: Spurious writ
hello
Race conditions as you suggest would be the fault of the operating
system and/or filesystem design.
Nearly every operating system has drivers which queue requests so that
there is no chaos in the allocation of resources.
A design flaw that glaring would relegate the operating system to
hello
I am running GiP under MacOSX and Debian Linux .
I run multiple different GiP fetches from the same directory nearly
everyday on both MacOSX and Linux.
My multiple I mean 3 to 4 different fetches going at once from the
same directory.
Never have an issue.
The times I have had issues is
Until recently I have routinely run 2/3/4 instances of gip from one
Linux Terminal box with no problems - open multiple tabs in one session
and run separate downloads in each, sometimes all radio or TV and other
times a mix. I have not encountered a conflict with the download history
getting
Please see below ...
www.macfh.co.uk/CEMH.html
> -Original Message-
> From: get_iplayer [mailto:get_iplayer-boun...@lists.infradead.org]On
> Behalf Of Nick Payne
> Sent: 02 May 2016 13:41
> To: get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Spurious write permission
11 matches
Mail list logo
