On 10/10/2011 01:25, Nigel Taylor wrote:
There are only two changes to the get_iplayer script, since v2.80 was
tagged in git. The other 4 changes are specific to windows, related to
the windows installer. The need for a v2.81 yet may be open to debate.
As to whether a v2.81 release is justified
But this isn't about releases (at least in my mind) - hence the
suggestion to add the commit date to the version number in git - so a
release would have no commit date, interim patched versions would.
I would say that any version string should include the "git describe"
output David W described
On 09/10/2011 17:13, bat guano wrote:
Some programs (such as FFmpeg-git) show the 'commit'.
The version string with commit ID is inserted into FFmpeg when it is
compiled. The process relies on having access to a clone of the git
repo in order to retrieve the commit history. Look at version.
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 08:51 +0100, JasonW wrote:
> On 10 October 2011 01:25, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> > On 10/09/11 17:13, bat guano wrote:
>
> >> I think that would be a good feature.
> >> Some programs (such as FFmpeg-git) show the 'commit'.
>
>
> > Releases should be made regardless of the wind
On 10 October 2011 01:25, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> On 10/09/11 17:13, bat guano wrote:
>> I think that would be a good feature.
>> Some programs (such as FFmpeg-git) show the 'commit'.
> Releases should be made regardless of the windows installer, then should
> windows fall behind and window users
On 10/09/11 17:13, bat guano wrote:
>
>
>>
>> With all the incremental changes made by dinkypumpkin (and others) to
>> the 2.80 perl script, I was thinking it might be a good thing to
>> somehow distinguish between them quickly...
>>
> Hi
> I think that would be a good feature.
> Some programs (s
>
> With all the incremental changes made by dinkypumpkin (and others) to
> the 2.80 perl script, I was thinking it might be a good thing to
> somehow distinguish between them quickly...
>
Hi
I think that would be a good feature.
Some programs (such as FFmpeg-git) show the 'commit'.
With all the incremental changes made by dinkypumpkin (and others) to
the 2.80 perl script, I was thinking it might be a good thing to
somehow distinguish between them quickly...
Perhaps instead of x.yy maybe x.yy-yymmdd ? Just something to make it
obvious without having to do a diff/similar.
Jus
8 matches
Mail list logo
