On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:33 +0100, TQ wrote:
> If possible, whilst banging on about the simplest of issues regarding
> the operation of mailing lists, would participants be so kind as to add
> "[NO ACTUAL GET_IPLAYER CONTENT]" to the subject line, in order that the
> posts might reach /dev/null wit
If possible, whilst banging on about the simplest of issues regarding
the operation of mailing lists, would participants be so kind as to add
"[NO ACTUAL GET_IPLAYER CONTENT]" to the subject line, in order that the
posts might reach /dev/null with no human intervention?
--
"Through the abusive int
On Sun Sep 1 12:20:20 BST 2013, I wrote:
but has yet to make any in-existing-thread posts,
which was the problem faced to begin with...
What I meant to write was:
... but has yet to make any in-existing-thread posts
- apart from this thread, ...
V.
On Fri Aug 30 14:28:32 BST 2013, I wrote:
(this issue was recently discussed in the list, may
or may not be particular to this list and may depend
on the mail client used...).
I'm afraid I'm not an expert in this field, others truely
knowledgeable are free to chime in for corrections/additions!
On 01/09/13 10:38, Andy Wedge wrote:
Is anyone else getting bored with this topic now?
Don't worry, I'm sure the list owner will be along shortly to politely
remind everyone of the need to keep on topic.
--
Paul
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_ip
> FWIW, I'm with David all the way.
>
> R.
Is anyone else getting bored with this topic now?
A.
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
FWIW, I'm with David all the way.
R.
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 01:24 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
> On 31/08/2013 23:48, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > As David is the list owner, I think it's reasonable for him to comment
> > on list admin matters..
>
> You are quite right. I was unaware of David's position as list owner and
> wouldn't have
On 31/08/2013 23:48, Stuart Henderson wrote:
As David is the list owner, I think it's reasonable for him to comment
on list admin matters..
You are quite right. I was unaware of David's position as list owner and
wouldn't have challenged his entitlement to say whatever he wants.
My problem is
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 23:26 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
> On 31/08/2013 22:09, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:46 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
> >
> >> I'm sorry David, but I find this very offensive.
> >
> > Before we continue, I would ask you to watch this video:
> > http://www.snotr.c
> And thus you should only get the one copy of this message; the list
> shouldn't send you the second?
Correct! (I did get two copies from your previous post.)
> If that's not true, I have a more complex debugging session coming
> my way... :)
You can go to bed with a weight off your mind! :
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 00:10 +0100, J K.Eason wrote:
> > The address 'j...@jeason.cix.co.uk' is not subscribed to the list;
> > you are subscribed with another address.
> >
> > Thus, the list software doesn't *know* that it's a duplicate.
>
> Ah that would explain it. Thanks David. I've now chang
> The address 'j...@jeason.cix.co.uk' is not subscribed to the list;
> you are subscribed with another address.
>
> Thus, the list software doesn't *know* that it's a duplicate.
Ah that would explain it. Thanks David. I've now changed to the correct
email address to match the one that the list k
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 23:51 +0100, J K.Eason wrote:
> > That poster might like to investigate the settings on
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/get_iplayer -
> > specifically "Avoid duplicate copies of messages".
>
> For what it's worth, I've just looked and 'Avoid duplicate copies of
> That poster might like to investigate the settings on
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/get_iplayer -
> specifically "Avoid duplicate copies of messages".
For what it's worth, I've just looked and 'Avoid duplicate copies of
messages?' *is* checked in my settings.
Regards
John
> Note that one poster above was unhappy that he received a private
> copy in addition to that from the list.
I wouldn't say that I was particularly unhappy. It's just that it's the
first time I've seen a posting replying to one of my posts that was
actually sent directly to me *as well* as to th
On 31/08/2013 22:09, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:46 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
I'm sorry David, but I find this very offensive.
Before we continue, I would ask you to watch this video:
http://www.snotr.com/video/8285/Steve_Hughes_-_Offended
Watch it from 3:20 to 5:45. Before
On 2013/08/31 21:50, Colin Law wrote:
> Note that one poster above was unhappy that he received a private copy
> in addition to that from the list.
That poster might like to investigate the settings on
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/get_iplayer -
specifically "Avoid duplicate copies of
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 21:50 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
> I don't think it is odd, again on most of the lists I subscribe to
> posters prefer not to get two copies, so Reply is the right thing to
> do.
Have you actually read through the reply-to-list page that I have posted
a number of times now? I ta
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:46 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
> On 30/08/2013 23:10, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 13:59 +0100, Mable Syrup wrote:
> >
> >> I'm sure there must be something, but I can't find it. I want to
> >> reply to different items in a thread in a manner that preserve
On 31 August 2013 21:50, Colin Law wrote:
> Whatever the rights and wrongs of how a list /should/ be setup the
> fact is that many users think of a post as having come from the list,
> not from an individual, and hence expect Reply to go to the list. The
> proof of this is the number of times po
On 31 August 2013 21:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:25 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
> ...
>> With gmail unfortunately there is no Reply to List, so I have to use
>> Reply to All, and then try and remember to manually remove the one to
>> the sender, though I am never sure whether
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 20:25 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
> On 31 August 2013 12:33, J K.Eason wrote:
> >> Sorry, was using 'reply all' - will stop that now - thanks for
> >> pointing it out
Argh, no!
Using 'reply all' is exactly the *right* thing to do.
Except in odd circumstances, you *should* be i
On 30/08/2013 23:10, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 13:59 +0100, Mable Syrup wrote:
I'm sure there must be something, but I can't find it. I want to
reply to different items in a thread in a manner that preserves the
threading.
I don't really understand why this is an issue. I
On 31 August 2013 12:33, J K.Eason wrote:
>> Sorry, was using 'reply all' - will stop that now - thanks for
>> pointing it out
>
> No problem. That one was ok! :^)
With gmail unfortunately there is no Reply to List, so I have to use
Reply to All, and then try and remember to manually remove the
> Sorry, was using 'reply all' - will stop that now - thanks for
> pointing it out
No problem. That one was ok! :^)
Regards
John
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_ipla
"..and I got your reply twice because you're replying both to me *and* to
the list. You should normally only need to reply to the list."
Sorry, was using 'reply all' - will stop that now - thanks for pointing it out
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_
> Thanks John, Windows Live Mail is the only one converting the text
> to attachments, yet your message arrived as a 'regular' text email
> with no attachments on the same machine :-S
> No biggie, it was just a 'nay' vote for attachments
That's because my message was sent as plain text (as I d
"I think that depends on your mail client. For instance, if I read
David's messages in Windows Mail under Vista on my laptop I see exactly
the same as you with the message content in an attachment, but using my
normal proprietary mail program his message is displayed correctly."
Thanks John, Wi
> Some of these posts come to me as attachments instead of text _ is
> that a new thing?
> dwmw2_s last post arrived as ATT00159.txt along with smime.p7s and
> no legible text was in the 'message' itself
I think that depends on your mail client. For instance, if I read
David's messages in Wind
And did you really just send that question *three* times? Once as HTML,
which the list will have rejected but I got my copy. A second time to me
*only*, and a *third* attempt which actually did the right thing?
Personally, I usually give up after after the *second* consecutive
failure to send an
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 11:38 +0100, Andrew Moore wrote:
> Some of these posts come to me as attachments instead of text – is
> that a new thing?
No, that's just a bug in your mail client.
> dwmw2’s last post arrived as ATT00159.txt along with smime.p7s and no
> legible text was in the 'message' it
Some of these posts come to me as attachments instead of text – is that a new
thing?
dwmw2’s last post arrived as ATT00159.txt along with smime.p7s and no legible
text was in the 'message' itself
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 10:35 +0100, Mable Syrup wrote:
> The issue was that I was only getting digests to cut down on traffic,
Ah, right. Yeah, the digests are a stupid concept, and make it fairly
much impossible to do the right thing. I keep meaning to disable them
entirely.
Also, please make su
Woodhouse
To: Mable Syrup
Cc: "get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org"
Sent: Friday, 30 August 2013, 23:10
Subject: Re: can someone point me to the list instructions please ...
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 13:59 +0100, Mable Syrup wrote:
> I'm sure there must be something, but I can'
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 13:59 +0100, Mable Syrup wrote:
> I'm sure there must be something, but I can't find it. I want to
> reply to different items in a thread in a manner that preserves the
> threading.
I don't really understand why this is an issue. It's all really really
simple:
Every mail m
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 23:23 +0100, Roger Bell_West wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:10:56PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >Did I miss anything?
>
> That a standards-compliant modern MUA will also have a reply-to-list
> function, which acts on the RFC2369 headers to direct a reply intended
> f
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:10:56PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>Did I miss anything?
That a standards-compliant modern MUA will also have a reply-to-list
function, which acts on the RFC2369 headers to direct a reply intended
forthe list to the right address.
On 30/08/2013 13:59, Mable Syrup wrote:
I'm sure there must be something, but I can't find it. I want to
reply to different items in a thread in a manner that preserves the
threading.
The correct thing to do depends on the mail client you are using. I see
you are on the Yahoo Mail Web Servic
On Fri Aug 30 13:59:51 BST 2013, Mable Syrup wrote:
I want to reply to different items in a thread
in a manner that preserves the threading.
Hi again Mable Syrup!
I was also having this issue (due to pure infamiliarity with mailing lists)
back when I started posting here, please read this fro
I'm sure there must be something, but I can't find it. I want to reply to
different items in a thread in a manner that preserves the threading.
Ta.
Mable
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/
41 matches
Mail list logo
