Re: Failing test

2013-01-14 Thread Iavor Diatchki
Hello, On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > > Are these four failures the result of your changes? > > Should we fix the tests? > (sorry, this went to the fun-dep thread so it probably got buried among the other e-mails). About the tests: When I ran the type-checker

Re: LLVM failures

2013-01-14 Thread David Terei
'configure' could play a role but doesn't at the moment as we always compile the LLVM backend and it dynamically supports a few different LLVM versions. So there has been nothing to decide at compile time. A patch was added a while back to allow 'configure' to specify where to find the llvm binari

LLVM failures

2013-01-14 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
I'm getting testsuite failures like this on Windows : Warning: Couldn't figure out LLVM version! Make sure you have installed LLVM Fair enough, but shouldn't 'configure' find out if I have LLVM. And if I don't, shouldn't the tests be disabled? Do we have instructions for insta

Failing test

2013-01-14 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Iavor Are these four failures the result of your changes? Should we fix the tests? Should the error message say "The instance decl is inconsistent with the fundeps"? And maybe be more precise about which fundep. I'm a bit confused. Simon => Gentle(normal) 1182 of 3527 [0, 3, 0] cd ./inde

RE: Is there unused code in GHC source?

2013-01-14 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Almost certainly some, but probably not all that much. Do highlight any that you find. Simon | -Original Message- | From: ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] | On Behalf Of Jan Stolarek | Sent: 14 January 2013 13:00 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Is

Is there unused code in GHC source?

2013-01-14 Thread Jan Stolarek
Dear devs, I'm trying to dig into GHC code and one thing is wondering me. Does the source contain old fragments of code that are not used anymore? Well, for such a big project the answer will probably be 'yes', but I'm wondering what the scale of this might be. I thought that such leftovers

ASSERT when cross compiling to QNX with Debug enabled

2013-01-14 Thread Nathan Hüsken
Hey, When I cross compile to arm-unknown-nto-qnx8.0.0eabi and add DDEBUG to GhcStage1HcOpts I get: "inplace/bin/ghc-stage1" -static -H64m -O0 -fllvm-package-name base-4.7.0.0 -hide-all-packages -i -ilibraries/base/. -ilibraries/base/dist-install/build -ilibraries/base/dist-install/build/auto

make install failing

2013-01-14 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
I just did a clean build of my cross-compiling GHC with --prefix set in the top-level ./configure call. When I run `make install` I get: "/home/singpolyma/bbndk/host_10_0_9_404/linux/x86/usr/lib/ghc-7.7.20130112/bin/ghc-pkg" --force --global-package-db "/home/singpolyma/bbndk/host_10_0_9_404/