Hs-boot files tend to get in the way of optimisation. Moreover, sometimes they
are truly necessary, and if there are un-necessary ones that can greatly
complicate adding necessary ones. There are already LOTS of data types
declared as instances of Typeable at the place that Typeable class is d
Hi Edsko,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:38:25PM +0200, Edsko de Vries wrote:
>
> I'm trying to build and install ghc head, with the installation of the
> .haddocks. I'm running into all kinds of trouble though. I have
> docbook and docbook-xsl installed,
docbook isn't related to building haddock d
I agree that hs-boot files are a little inelegant, but is there a bigger
problem with them? I consider instances to be more tied to a datatype
definition than the class definition. It may be possible (I think it is) to
avoid the Proxy.hs-boot and Equality.hs-boot files if we scatter their
insta
Richard I am deeply suspicious of all these hs-boot files.
Instances should preferably go EITHER with the data type declaration OR with
the class declaration.
In the case of Proxy, for example, why can't the Typeable instance for Proxy go
in Data.Typeable.Internals? (And perhaps similarly fo
That seems to have fixed it. Thanks!
Simon
On 24/07/13 13:17, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
My fault -- sorry. Forgot to push the change to haddock when I pushed base.
Update your haddock, and you should be OK.
Richard
On 2013-07-24 13:10, Simon Marlow wrote:
A validate today on x86_64/Linux is
Of course -- that worked. I was very muddled in my thinking yesterday,
figuring that the error was legitimate.
Thanks,
Richard
On 2013-07-23 20:11, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
I'd suggest using "WithinType" as the argument to synifyType that's
currently an error call in Haddock.Convert line 356
My fault -- sorry. Forgot to push the change to haddock when I pushed
base.
Update your haddock, and you should be OK.
Richard
On 2013-07-24 13:10, Simon Marlow wrote:
A validate today on x86_64/Linux is failing with
haddock: internal error: synifyKind
While haddocking the base package.
A validate today on x86_64/Linux is failing with
haddock: internal error: synifyKind
While haddocking the base package. Anyone know why?
Cheers,
Simon
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/g
On 23/07/13 00:04, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:51:49PM -0700, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
changing the default umask on the entire server is not necessary to fix
this problem. Git already has support for exactly this use case
Well, I don't mind if someone wants to do the git thing
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 23.07.2013, 18:58 + schrieb Simon Peyton-Jones:
> If you add -XIncoherentInstances *just to the module that has instance
> IsNT a a*, then it'll work fine I think. This says "pick this
> instance even though an instantiation of the constraint might match a
> more specific
10 matches
Mail list logo
