The error in snow leopard is the result of my patch [1] for #8266 [2], which
ensures that the original build directory is no longer referenced in installed
packages/libs.
The patch is just a proper implementation of the original design though.
Perhaps the relative-dynlib-references procedure
Patrick, does this have any effect on the performance of the compiler (runtime,
allocation)?
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-commits [mailto:ghc-commits-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| g...@git.haskell.org
| Sent: 13 November 2013 03:40
| To: ghc-comm...@haskell.org
|
Hi Simon, Joachim, and others,
I'm in the midst of reimplementing GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving in terms of
coerce. See #8503 for why I'm doing this. But, I've run up against a limitation
of Coercible I'd like to know more about. Currently, the stage2 compiler fails
to build because of the
Ah, life is never as simple as you hope.
The whole treatment of recursive types is a bit flaky in GHC. For newtypes
here is the motivation
newtype R = MkR R
Now if we have an instance
instance Coercible a R = Coercible a R
we aren't going to make much progress. Mutual recursion
Hi,
I've hit a build failure when trying to build HEAD on Mavericks. I've
logged a bug here with a lot of detail:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8528.
When using alex 3.1.2, some of the generated files have spaces preceding
preprocessor statements, while alex 3.1.0 doesn't do this. I
That is indeed revolting.
Why not make
sfMatchFam :: [Type] - Maybe (CoAxiomRule, [Type], Type)
thus getting rid of the TcCoercion, and baking in the flaky assumption by
construction.
Then I think you can put the whole definition of TcBuiltInSynFamily (with a
non-Tc name) into CoAxiom.
I've moved this conversation to the comments on #8503, which is where I should
have started it in the first place. Please see there for my response.
Richard
On Nov 13, 2013, at 6:27 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
Ah, life is never as simple as you hope.
The whole
On 13/11/2013, at 8:02 PM, Christiaan Baaij wrote:
Does validate work for the DPH packages on Linux?
sh validate runs fine on my Linux machine, but neither of my Macs.
I can also run the dph tests manually on Linux, and they work fine.
Ben.
___
Great job nick!
now we just need to sort out the problem and fix it! :)
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Nick Partridge nkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've hit a build failure when trying to build HEAD on Mavericks. I've
logged a bug here with a lot of detail:
Ben has an excellent point:
if things are broken on mac, lets fix it! Especially since we should be
hitting RC status shortly any breakages should be smashed ASAP.
This does raise a point I hope we'll address more aggressively after the
7.8 release, namely trying to keep ghc less broken by
10 matches
Mail list logo
