Could not have agreed more with Manuel.
I would also like to point out that one of the missions of the arcanist
tool is to support all version control systems. That have made sense for
FaceBook Inc, who went from Subversion to Git to Mercurial. GHC team
only use git now. I think the consequenc
On 06/07/2014 07:21 AM, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> So, why not put everything on GutHub and use pull requests and so on?
>
> SimonM writes that Phabricator is better than GitHub. I’m happy to believe
> that, but he also writes that using it requires installing local software and
> quite a b
This always gets brought up, but I (still) think there are several
reasons to prefer our own infrastructure over GitHub:
- Phab is far more flexible, especially for review. GitHub doesn't
even have side-by-side diffs (a massive improvement), much less the
suite of tools that make code review easy
I don't think Arcanist forces any particular workflow after working
with it a bit. Generally, all you have to do is checkout a branch,
make some commits on that branch, and run 'arc diff'. Make more
commits on that branch, run 'arc diff' again. When it's ready I can
merge it however I want. This wo
Well, I'm convinced now that you have researched this thoroughly. Thanks
for doing so and addressing mine and Manuel's concerns.
Cheers,
Arash
On 2014-06-07 09:24, Austin Seipp wrote:
This always gets brought up, but I (still) think there are several
reasons to prefer our own infrastructure ov
2014-06-07 0:17 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Kowalczyk :
> I notice that the builds with failing
> test results are still marked as successful. Would it not be useful to
> indicate that there are failing tests somehow?
The result is based on the value that the invoked command returns.
That is, for the testin
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 07.06.2014, 12:21 +0200 schrieb Páli Gábor János:
> 2014-06-07 0:17 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Kowalczyk :
> > It'd be a shame to have
> > various test results from multiple machines but not use them.
>
> I see what you mean. But I would also feel strange to mark the test
> results fa
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 22:27:30 +0300, Sergei Trofimovich writes:
> Can you write what problems are to ship those libraries in it's current form?
> Do you have some linking problems or something?
>
> Ticket does not describe any actual problems.
Sorry for the two days of delay, I'm on Zurihac.
I mo
Thanks Fuuzetsu,
Tomorrow I'll still be at the ZuriHac, so hopefully I'll able to adjust the
patch :)
I'll poke you if you'll be around
Thanks!
Alfredo Di Napoli
> On 07/giu/2014, at 07:23, "GHC" wrote:
>
> #8226: Remove the old style -- # Haddock comments.
> -
Hi Michael,
Am Samstag, den 07.06.2014, 21:06 +0300 schrieb Michael Snoyman:
> If there was a daily snapshot build, I would be happy to set up some
> kind of regular process to download that snapshot and do a Stackage
> run on it. I'm currently blocked on this kind of activity, since I
> can't ge
On 06/07/2014 11:57 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Am Samstag, den 07.06.2014, 21:06 +0300 schrieb Michael Snoyman:
>
>> If there was a daily snapshot build, I would be happy to set up some
>> kind of regular process to download that snapshot and do a Stackage
>> run on it. I'm cur
11 matches
Mail list logo
