Re: Moving Haddock *development* out of GHC tree

2014-08-14 Thread Mateusz Kowalczyk
On 08/14/2014 01:43 AM, Carter Schonwald wrote: > one thing I wonder about is how should we approach noting > "theres a new language constructor, we should figure out a good way to > present it in haddock" in this work flow? > because the initial haddocks presentation might just be a strawman till

Re: Moving Haddock *development* out of GHC tree

2014-08-14 Thread Carter Schonwald
good points by all :) On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote: > On 08/14/2014 01:43 AM, Carter Schonwald wrote: > > one thing I wonder about is how should we approach noting > > "theres a new language constructor, we should figure out a good way to > > present it in haddock"

Help with fusion rules and such

2014-08-14 Thread David Feuer
I've worked out the basics of how to make more functions from GHC.Base, GHC.List, and Data.List participate in foldr/build fusion, but I could really use some help figuring out how to write the RULES to accompany them. I have too little experience with GHC's simplification process to manage this on

Re: Moving Haddock *development* out of GHC tree

2014-08-14 Thread Mateusz Kowalczyk
On 08/13/2014 11:09 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote: > On 08/08/2014 06:25 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote: >> Hello, >> >> [snip] >> >> Transition from current setup: >> If I receive some patches I was promised then I will then make a 2.14.4 >> bugfix/compat release make sure that master is up to date and