I'd be ok with this. It's a bit more verbose, but if it's less confusing for
our users, then go for it.
Thanks for offering to make a patch!
SImon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Howard B. Golden
| Sent: 21 August 2014 22:30
|
Friends
My Windows build is still broken, and has been since Andreas's patch
commit f9f89b7884ccc8ee5047cf4fffdf2b36df6832df
on Tues 19th.
Please can someone help? I'm begging.
I suppose that if I hear nothing I can simply revert his patch but that seems
like the Wrong Solution
I think reverting the patch (and notifying the author) is an OK course of
action if it's affecting other people's work. I believe it's common
practice at many other places. The patch can always be replied later, after
fixing it.
P.S. We should re-open the bug if we revert the patch (i.e. by git
Marginally less verbose; why not use the language extension *only* in running
text? Preferably with a link to the documentation of that language extension.
In your example:
| The language extension refUnicodeSyntax/ref enables Unicode characters to
be
| used to stand for certain ASCII
I've looked into this patch, it looks like this patch was intended to
touch only linuxish IO Manager, but in fact it touched common (os
unrelated) code here and there extensively and there are almost no
chances somebody else (not the author) can fix the things.
So, almost the only way to
Yes, I meant producer there.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:36 AM, GHC ghc-devs@haskell.org wrote:
#9496: Simplify primitives for short cut fusion
-+-
Reporter: dfeuer |Owner: dfeuer
p.k.f.,
I like your less verbose suggestion better than my original.
I don't understand your comment about code examples: Are you supporting or
opposing the inclusion of the LANGUAGE pragmas in the examples?
Howard
From: p.k.f.holzensp...@utwente.nl
I'm just noticing this thread now... sorry about the delay and the
problems! I'll look into what happened here.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:04 AM, kyra ky...@mail.ru wrote:
I've looked into this patch, it looks like this patch was intended to
touch only linuxish IO Manager, but in fact it
I've reverted it in the mean time
(4748f5936fe72d96edfa17b153dbfd84f2c4c053), sorry about that. I've
spent some time working on a Windows Phabricator machine, so stay
tuned!
Andreas, if you need a Windows VM or something temporarily to test, do
let me know.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:00 PM,
Dear core library folks others,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Simon Peyton Jones
simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
Some core libraries (e.g. random) have a maintainer that isn’t the
committee.
Ah, since it came up, maybe this is a good time to discuss that particular
maintainership. I'm
I'm pretty sure we'd be up for taking ownership of it as it is a rather
fundamental piece of infrastructure in the community, and easily falls
within our purview.
That said, if you're concerned that you haven't been able to really push
the random library forward the way it deserves to be pushed,
11 matches
Mail list logo
