Re: Moving Haddock *development* out of GHC tree

2014-08-26 Thread Mateusz Kowalczyk
On 08/25/2014 01:21 PM, Alan Kim Zimmerman wrote: What happens in the case of a change to the dev branch of ghc that requires a patch to haddock as well, how does that patch get added to phabricator, or is there a separate process? A case in point is https://phabricator.haskell.org/D157

Re: Moving Haddock *development* out of GHC tree

2014-08-26 Thread Alan Kim Zimmerman
Ok thanks. I am travelling at the moment, will try this in a few days. Alan On 26 Aug 2014 11:23 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk fuuze...@fuuzetsu.co.uk wrote: On 08/25/2014 01:21 PM, Alan Kim Zimmerman wrote: What happens in the case of a change to the dev branch of ghc that requires a patch to

Why isn't ($) inlining when I want?

2014-08-26 Thread David Feuer
tl;dr I added a simplifier run with inlining enabled between specialization and floating out. It seems incapable of inlining saturated applications of ($), and I can't figure out why. These are inlined later, when phase 2 runs. Am I running the simplifier wrong or something? I'm working on this