On 12/10/2014 10:13 PM, Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
> This is a single stat failure in haddock.base; doesn't happen for me.
>
> Simon
>
> | -Original Message-
> | From: nore...@phabricator.haskell.org
> | [mailto:nore...@phabricator.haskell.org]
> | Sent: 10 December 2014 18:48
> | To: Sim
2014-12-10 16:16 GMT+03:00 Joachim Breitner :
> Hi,
>
> I guess you CCed me because of:
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2014, 16:43 +0400 schrieb Lennart Kolmodin:
> > Linux distributions, and packages for other OSs are responsible for
> > copying the required file to the right location.
>
Yes, and al
This is a single stat failure in haddock.base; doesn't happen for me.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: nore...@phabricator.haskell.org
| [mailto:nore...@phabricator.haskell.org]
| Sent: 10 December 2014 18:48
| To: Simon Peyton Jones
| Subject: [Diffusion] [Build Failed] rGHC37b3646c9d
Yes, it got faster when compiled with -fno-state-hack. It also got faster
when I added a second (useless) reference to cf (changing the definition of
doProbs to cf `seq` replicateM_ m doProb)
Also, when profiling, the number of entries into findChain decreased
significantly after adding -fno-stat
Just to check, when you say that “I found it was an instance of…” do you mean
“I compiled with –fno-state-hack as the only change, and it got faster again”?
Otherwise how would you know this was the cause?
Simon
From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of David Spies
Sen
On Wed, Dec 10 2014, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> On 2014-12-09 at 23:47:01 +0100, Greg Weber wrote:
>> I added documentation to
>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Preparation/Linux and linked
>> from https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Preparation/MacOSX
>
> Btw, you
The image I created is designed to mount your source code into the image.
You could certainly stick the source code in the image. do a make, and then
distribute that docker image.
The problem is now: how do you modify files with Emacs?
Before it was easy: the source code is mounted from your file
Hello,
> Hacking on GHC for the first time is death by a thousand cuts.
> Any one part of the process is not that bad, but as a whole the process is
> very cumbersome for someone new.
>
With the docker image, would it be possible to distribute pre-built
versions of the GHC source tarball? Mayb
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel
wrote:
> On 2014-12-09 at 23:47:01 +0100, Greg Weber wrote:
> > I added documentation to
> > https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Preparation/Linux and
> linked
> > from https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Preparation/Ma
Here's an update to our efforts to get a working build of text-icu
on Windows 64 bits:
I am working together with Kyra on this on the café list.
It is becoming clear that GHC is unable to use standard
DLLs on Windows 64 bits. That means FFI is really broken
on that platform at the moment.
By "una
Hi,
I guess you CCed me because of:
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2014, 16:43 +0400 schrieb Lennart Kolmodin:
> Linux distributions, and packages for other OSs are responsible for
> copying the required file to the right location.
I’ll include that file once we get around to packaging 7.10 (which isn’t
Hi everybody!
TL;DL GHC 7.10 will have better bash completion, try it out! I'd like your
help to verify the categorisation of DynFlags into ghc / ghci / shared or
hidden flags.
I've been working on improving the command line completion support in GHC
7.10.
The main idea is that it should be more
On 2014-12-09 at 23:47:01 +0100, Greg Weber wrote:
> I added documentation to
> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Preparation/Linux and linked
> from https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Preparation/MacOSX
Btw, you write
> This way you can still hack on GHC with Emacs, etc,
13 matches
Mail list logo
