> There was a rewrite mentioned here [2]. The deSugar/DsArrows.hs [3] looks
> convoluted. Any progress or work needed?
Take a look at #7828 ticket. There was an intention to rewrite arrow desugarer
and I worked on it
for some time but eventually abandoned it. Sophie Taylor was planning to take
u
Aha. I believe that the ghc-7.10 branch simply doesn't have the source file
testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/T9961.hs
but all.T still runs the test. So we get "does not exist: T9961.hs", and of
course very little allocation.
Austin or Herbert, could you add T9961.hs to the 7.10 branch?
Si
I don't think so. There's no guarantee that future versions will maintain
it, and I don't know that we want to take responsibility for continually
checking on that.
David
On Feb 20, 2015 Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
> It'd be good to document this condition/invariant in the Haddocks,
wouldn't it?!
>
Hi
the section header “Character classification” could indicate that these
predicates are based on the Unicode standard, and possibly for each
predicate indicate the definition in terms of Unicode character classes.
Greetings,
Joachim
Am Freitag, den 20.02.2015, 08:20 -0500 schrieb David Feuer:
