Hi,
I raised this question on #haskell, and was advised that this was probably
the best place to discuss.
I see that Applicative Do is scheduled for GHC 8.0 [1], and was hoping that
this might also enable support for Applicative Comprehensions [2]. Is this
likely to be the case? If not, would it
Hi,
Am Montag, den 12.10.2015, 08:09 + schrieb David A Roberts:
> I understand that comprehensions tend not to be used much in
> idiomatic Haskell,
quite contrary! I use them extensively in real-world-projects, and I
claim to write idomatic code :-)
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim “nomeata”
Sounds reasonable to me. Do-notation and comprehension notation are really
just syntactic sugar for the same thing.
Simon
From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of David A
Roberts
Sent: 12 October 2015 09:10
To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Applicative Comprehensions
I like this idea because having the pure function call at the beginning (rather
than at the end, as with do-notation) is more consistent with the original
<$>,<*>-notation.
It only slightly bothers me that the bracket notation in this form has nothing
to do with lists, so that may be a bit conf
Paralell comprehension syntax will be confusing.
If user have both MonadComprehensions and ApplicativeDo enabled, it makes total
sense to desugar monad comprehensions into Applicative expression when it’s
possible, and into Monadic otherwise. I’m actually a bit surprised if it’s not
already a c
Hi,
As a GHC API user, I would like to run GHC’s strictness and demand analysis
pass, but I don’t want any worker/wrappers.
My specific use-case is to generate digital circuits from Haskell code, where
I’ve yet to encounter any benefit from worker/wrappers: the generated circuits
do not get any
I think this is the right time for me to exit:
The truth is, I still can't bring myself to use a version of Haskell post
the Foldable-Traversable-aPocalypse, let alone some future Haskell after
the changes now in the works. My personal machines are all still 7.8. My
personal projects are all pre-F
Thanks Mark for all your work over the years! Haskell has the adoption it does
today in no small part because of your work in making sure it has been
consistently easy to install over a range of systems. You’ve put many years and
long hours into the work you’ve done as release manager, and we al
