I am not sure I entirely understand your proposal, but a good
way of finding out if it works is giving it a try.
Excerpts from Christopher Done's message of 2016-06-26 06:28:55 -0400:
> I've been pondering how feasible it would be to:
>
> * Compile in stages a module with the byte code linker
> *
I've been pondering how feasible it would be to:
* Compile in stages a module with the byte code linker
* Keep hold of the Core source
* Interpret the Core AST within Haskell
* When encountering built-in/primitives (or things from other libraries),
we compile that Core term and link it as an HValu
Harendra Kumar writes:
> On 19 June 2016 at 14:03, Ben Gamari wrote:
>
>>
>> Indeed it would be great if you could provide the program that produced
>> this code.
>>
>> >> It would be great to open Trac tickets to track some of the optimization
>
>
> Ok, I created an account on ghc trac and rais
Simon Marlow wrote:
> Is it just perf-llvm?
It seems to be. I build quite a large number of configurations in my Jenkins
instance. All of the configurations other than perf-llvm built fine.
> Does validate fail?
I actually haven't tried validate directly because my build configrations
explici
Is it just perf-llvm? Does validate fail? What platform is this?
On 26 June 2016 at 07:29, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>
> > > Erik, could it be the same symptom as Edward is seeing here?
> > > https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12230
> >
> > Yes it is.
>
> Jus
