Hi,
again, Travis is failing to build master since a while. Unfortunately,
only the author of commits get mailed by Travis, so I did not notice it
so far. But usually, when Travis reports a build failure, this is
something actionable! If in doubt, contact me.
The breakage at the moment occurs onl
Hi,
Brynmar, via Richard, has sponsored a new machine to build GHC commits
for https://perf.haskell.org/ghc/ and I have set it up now.
Since the numbers will be incomparable with the previous ones, I
started the benchmarking from scratch, starting with
853cdaea7f8724cd071f4fa7ad6c5377a2a8a6e4
wh
Thanks for the pointers, Simon. Some more specific questions:
* To access an unfolding, is `maybeUnfoldingTemplate (idUnfolding v)` the
recommended recipe?
* Is it the case that this recipe succeeds (`Just`) in some compiler
phases and not others?
If so, is this difference due to Ids being
I don’t really understand your question clearly. So I’ll guess
Unfoldings are added to Ids in Simplify.completeBind (look for
setUnfoldingInfo). Apart from INLINE pragmas, that’s about the only place it
happens.
Does that help?
S
From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behal
Since you suggested a rewrite of GHC's handling of proc-syntax, are there any
opinions on integrating generalized arrows (Joseph 2014) in the process? I
think they would greatly improve arrows! I don't know if I have the time to
attempt this, but if I find the time I would give it a try. Why was
Simon, Richard,
thank you for your answer! I don't have time to look into the GHC sources
right now, but I will set aside some time after the holidays and take a
close look at what the exact restrictions on proc-notation are and document
them.
Since you suggested a rewrite of GHC's handling of pr
