I built all of Stackage with this RC the other night and didn't observe any
regressions. Hooray!
(Thanks to Doug Wilson for helping me get set up with his
https://github.com/duog/build-stackage repo.)
Ryan S.
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.o
Do TypeReps need to be cyclic?
No – I think David is working on a non-cyclic version
Simon
From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Simon Marlow
Sent: 02 November 2017 10:27
To: David Feuer
Cc: Joachim Breitner ; ghc-devs
Subject: Re: Bringing some observable sharing t
Not being able to :print an exception would be quite annoying. Do TypeReps
need to be cyclic?
Observable sharing can be done with StableName, but that would be a bit
pile of hassle in the printer. Maybe exceptions warrant a special case.
Cheers
Simon
On 29 October 2017 at 20:40, David Feuer wro
On 31 October 2017 at 15:42, David Feuer wrote:
> Changes in GHC 8.2.1 lead to a lot of recompilation, because GHCi now
> refuses to load optimized
> code unless -fobject-code (and optimization flags) are enabled. I propose
> the following slight
> modification to https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc
Re: let-bindings floating more easily, would a check for
`exprIsOkForSpeculation scrut` in theory suffice to float out cases?
Yes; but instead we simply turn such cases into lets.
Simon
From: Sebastian Graf [mailto:sgraf1...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 November 2017 08:33
To: Simon Peyton Jones
Cc: gh
Thanks both of you, that makes sense.
Re: let-bindings floating more easily, would a check for
`exprIsOkForSpeculation scrut` in theory suffice to float out cases?
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Simon Peyton Jones
wrote:
> See Note [CoreSyn let/app invariant] in CoreSyn.
>
>
>
> Briefly, you
