Is it possible that GHC generates STG with invalid binding semantics for
certain cases that the Cmm codegen fix or ignore?
This could explain my observations.
I've checked the Stg linter source (StgLint.hs ; GHC 8.2.2 and github
master) and it does not check StgRhsClosure free var and binder list a
> Am 30.10.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Simon Marlow :
>
> I'm entirely happy to move, provided (1) whatever we move to provides the
> functionality we need, and (2) it's clearly what the community wants
> (considering both current and future contributors). In the past when moving
> to GitHub was brou
I’ve found that GitHub encourages git commits as a project journal even
though gits originating prject has a very diff / change set oriented
workflow. And The latter is a more useful granularity of contribution for
complex prjects like ghc.
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 10:27 AM Manuel M T Chakravarty
