> I also don't think one should be allowed to approve their own
> PR. If it is trivial enough to justify a self-accept then someone else
> should also be able to trivially accept it.
I disagree whole heartedly, as someone who's had to wait weeks for trivial
patches to get reviews no thanks.
We sho
Phyx writes:
>> I also don't think one should be allowed to approve their own
>> PR. If it is trivial enough to justify a self-accept then someone else
>> should also be able to trivially accept it.
>
> I disagree whole heartedly, as someone who's had to wait weeks for trivial
> patches to get re
There have been a flurry of MRs to add ownership to the CODEOWNERS
file but it's not clear to me what this file does.
It links to this page: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/code_owners.html
Which explains the syntax quite thoroughly but doesn't as far as I can
see explain how this informa
Matthew Pickering writes:
> There have been a flurry of MRs to add ownership to the CODEOWNERS
> file but it's not clear to me what this file does.
>
> It links to this page:
> https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/code_owners.html
>
> Which explains the syntax quite thoroughly but doesn't as
