Re: Is cleaning up old issues worthwhile?

2019-05-05 Thread Richard Eisenberg
I just want to second comments others have said about the value of this kind of activity. It is most certainly *not* annoying! If you're right and there is a migration issue, then it is indeed reasonable to stop and get feedback, but I'm (for one) comfortable having you close tickets that you

Re: Linear Types: ready for review

2019-05-05 Thread Eric Seidel
Hi Wolfgang, Just FYI, the GHC Steering Committee is currently reviewing a few more design decisions for the Linear Types proposal, one of which is the name of the unrestricted multiplicity. The current recommendation is to use Many rather than Omega

Re: Linear Types: ready for review

2019-05-05 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Hi, again! Here are the missing links to my previous e-mail: [1] https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/111#issuecomment-437271986 [2] https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/111#issuecomment-476125233 All the best, Wolfgang Am Sonntag, den 05.05.2019, 14:02 +0300

Re: Linear Types: ready for review

2019-05-05 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Freitag, den 03.05.2019, 11:52 +0200 schrieb Spiwack, Arnaud: > * The file `Multiplicity`, which defines `type Mult = Type`, the > `Scaled` type and functions unrestricted, linear, pattern > synonyms `One` and `Omega`, quick submultiplicity test submult Could `Omega` **please** be