On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 08:33:04PM -0700, Chris Smith wrote:
> This conversation reminds me of a parable I encountered somewhere, in which
> someone declares "I don't understand why this decision was ever made, and I
> we should change it", and someone responds, "No, if you don't understand
> the d
The only part of Safe Haskell I ever really cared about was type safety.
That's what matters, I think.
I've wanted to use it a number of times and played with it, but it's never
actually managed to become an important part of anything for me.
So take that as you will. I'd love it if it worked well
