Onward and upward! Those who are dedicated to getting things done on a day to
day basis-- you have done a great service for us all and I can't properly
express my appreciation. Making GHC sensible to the the rest of us is so
important.
Those who presented have enlightened and excited. I especia
/display/JENKINS/Plugins
[2] http://www.dctrwatson.com/2013/01/jenkins-and-phabricator/
[3] https://ci.jenkins-ci.org
On Jul 6, 2014, at 7:26 PM, William Knop wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> Apologies for the delayed response.
>
> I treated cloud compilation as “free” in the context of th
part. Of course, the devil is in the details, so I’d be
happy to set it up on a few of my machines to investigate.
Will
On Jun 20, 2014, at 6:15 AM, Páli Gábor János wrote:
> Hello William,
>
> 2014-06-20 0:50 GMT+02:00 William Knop :
>> 1. We have a pretty good spread of buildb
llo William,
>
> 2014-06-20 0:50 GMT+02:00 William Knop :
>> 1. We have a pretty good spread of buildbots, but as far as I know there
>> aren’t
>> very many of them. Running only the test suite would increase their utility
>> by
>> roughly 5x (from loo
Ah, yes, that's what I meant. I see your point about your example, now.
Will
> On Jun 19, 2014, at 3:27 AM, Tom Ellis
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:40:26PM -0400, William Knop wrote:
>> f = \x -> x
>> g = \x -> (x,1)
>> h = \x ->
> Windows builds upon changes. I could provide hardware for this. This
> would increase the visibility of reports, not require *any* new code,
> and already works.
>
> Overall, I will absolutely help you in every possible way, because
> this really is a problem for newcomers, and ex
> I've forgotten what I intended in the STG paper, but GHC's Core language
> certainly allows case on a function; all it does is to force the function to
> head normal form.
>
> Simon
>
> | -Original Message-
> | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bo
Hi Tom,
SPJ is surely more qualified to answer than I, but I'll take a stab.
In general, it is computationally infeasible to compare functions. Granted, in
your example, the function isn't being compared-- and therefore the case expr
is extraneous. I don't think there exists a feasible, uncontr
Hello all,
I’ve seen quite a few comments on the list and elsewhere lamenting the time it
takes to compile and validate ghc. It’s troublesome not only because it’s
inconvenient, but, more seriously, people are holding off on sending patches in
which stifles development. I would like to propose
