Re: Deriving tweaking

2016-08-05 Thread David Feuer
Excellent! On Aug 5, 2016 2:32 PM, "Edward Kmett" wrote: > Done and done! Retroactively. How is that for service? =) > > -Edward > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:08 PM, David Feuer wrote: > >> I know there's been some discussion about letting users select

Re: Deriving tweaking

2016-08-05 Thread Edward Kmett
Done and done! Retroactively. How is that for service? =) -Edward On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:08 PM, David Feuer wrote: > I know there's been some discussion about letting users select the > deriving mechanism they want, but I'd like to propose a separate tweak to > the

Deriving tweaking

2016-08-05 Thread David Feuer
I know there's been some discussion about letting users select the deriving mechanism they want, but I'd like to propose a separate tweak to the defaults. Specifically, it's annoying to have to use three pragmas to let me write newtype Foo f a = Foo (f a) deriving (Functor, Foldable, Traversable)