Friends
The 7.8 release is imminent. This email is to ask abou the status of your
contributions. In each case could you update the wiki with the current state
of play, and your intentions, including dates. That is, don't put your reply
in email: it on the status page below; though by all mean
nsky; ghc-
> | d...@haskell.org
> | Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
> |
> |
> | On 4 Sep 2013, at 15:52, Simon Peyton-Jones
> | wrote:
> |
> | > Edsko/Thomas/Luite: if you want anything for 7.8 it'll have to be
> | jolly soon. At the moment I don't e
@cis.upenn.edu); Geoffrey Mainland
> > | (mainl...@cs.drexel.edu); Iavor Diatchki; Austin Seipp; Edsko de
> Vries;
> > | Ryan Newton (rrnew...@gmail.com); David Luposchainsky; ghc-
> > | d...@haskell.org
> > | Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
> > |
> > |
gt; | To: Simon Peyton-Jones; Luite Stegeman
>> > | Cc: Nicolas Frisby; "Pedro Magalhães (drei...@gmail.com)"; Richard
>> > | Eisenberg (e...@cis.upenn.edu); Geoffrey Mainland
>> > | (mainl...@cs.drexel.edu); Iavor Diatchki; Austin Seipp; Edsko de
>> Vries;
>&
Iavor Diatchki
mailto:iavor.diatc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Simon Peyton-Jones mailto:simo...@microsoft.com>>
Date: Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:52 AM
Subject: GHC 7.8 release status
To: Nicolas Frisby mailto:nicolas.fri...@gmail.com>>,
"Pedro
05 September 2013 02:10
To: Thomas Schilling
Cc: Simon Peyton-Jones; Edsko de Vries; ghc-devs
Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
I've updated the wiki page, expanding the descriptions and adding code from the
actual implementation: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Ghc/Hooks
An demo progr
· **Why aren’t you using Data.Dynamic for the hook things? You are
precisely doing dynamic typing after all. (Moreover I want to change
Data.Dynamic so that it says
> data Dynamic where
> Dyn :: Typeable a => a -> Dynamic
> and you want to take advantage of this.
>
Ah the
s that sound ok?
>>
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Luite Stegeman [mailto:stege...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 07 September 2013 22:04
>> To: Simon Peyton-Jones
>> Cc: Thomas Schilling; Edsko de Vries; ghc-devs
>>
>>
>> Subjec
ion. And then you two, with Thomas
> and other interested parties, work together to evolve a design that everyone
> is happy with.
>
>
>
> Does that sound ok?
>
>
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> From: Luite Stegeman [mailto:stege...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 07 September 2013 22:
Edsko de Vries; ghc-devs
Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
* Why aren't you using Data.Dynamic for the hook things? You are
precisely doing dynamic typing after all. (Moreover I want to change
Data.Dynamic so that it says
data Dynamic where
Dyn :: Typeable a =>
interested parties, work together to evolve a design that
> everyone
> > is happy with.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does that sound ok?
> >
> >
> >
> > Simon
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Luite Stegeman [mailto:stege...@gmail.com]
> &g
te Stegeman [mailto:stege...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 September 2013 08:37
To: Edsko de Vries
Cc: Simon Peyton-Jones; ghc-devs; Edsko de Vries
Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
Edsko has done some work of rearranging imports in DynFlags to make the DLL
split work, and I've implemented the hoo
t clear to me why exactly those are the right places. But I suppose
> they are simply driven by what has been needed.
>
>
>
> Anyway if you two are happy (no one else seems to mind either way) then go
> ahead.
>
>
>
> Simon
>
>
>
>
>
> From: L
which tries to document some these loops too.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Edsko de Vries [mailto:edskodevr...@gmail.com]
| Sent: 11 September 2013 15:33
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: Luite Stegeman; ghc-devs; Edsko de Vries
| Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
|
| Hi all,
|
|
Friends,
After talking with Simon yesterday, we have some idea of how the
release will go. As I'm sure you're aware, the release is winding down
rather quickly, and it will be a fantastic one hopefully :)
Now that all the features have landed, we're going into bugfixing
mode. The schedule is, rou
Thanks for the reminder. Wiki is updated; atomics branch is merged. The
only further work I plan to do in the near term is add additional tests.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> Friends
>
> The 7.8 release is imminent. This email is to ask abou the status of you
@gmail.com); David Luposchainsky; ghc-
| d...@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: GHC 7.8 release status
|
|
| On 4 Sep 2013, at 15:52, Simon Peyton-Jones
| wrote:
|
| > Edsko/Thomas/Luite: if you want anything for 7.8 it'll have to be
| jolly soon. At the moment I don't even know the moti
Thank you Ryan!
I'll be getting my ARMv7 build machine back online today, hopefully.
Jens Peterson reported he had a working ARMv7 build to me today from
HEAD, which is good news.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Ryan Newton wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder. Wiki is updated; atomics branch is m
By the way, the parallel IO manager is also new in 7.8 right? I'm not sure
but I think it may have something to do with the excessive system time bug
I just filed:
http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8224
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskel
Yes, the parallel IO manager is new in 7.8. Thanks for reminding me of that
excessive system time issue. That's been nagging me for a while. Hopefully
I can find some time in the coming days to look at this again.
-Andi
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Ryan Newton wrote:
> By the way, the para
I added a note about the parallel IO manager status to
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/GHC-7.8. There are two issues
I'd still like to resolve. Is there a target date for the release?
-Andi
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Andreas Voellmy
wrote:
> Yes, the parallel IO manager is n
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Andreas Voellmy wrote:
> I added a note about the parallel IO manager status to
> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/GHC-7.8. There are two
> issues I'd still like to resolve. Is there a target date for the release?
>
Oh, I just noticed
http://permali
Unless I missed an RC announcement, I'm pretty sure we're running a little
behind the schedule from that email.
Deciders, has the Nov 25 target slid back? Any new estimates, if so?
Thanks much.
On Nov 14, 2013 9:40 PM, "Andreas Voellmy"
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Andreas V
Hi Nicolas,
I apologize if you didn't get the notice I sent last week on the update.
Right now I am endlessly battling windows, and while I actually DO
have a dynamic GHC working for windows with the DLL split (#5987,) it
is segfaulting in the stage2 compiler when compiling the 'time'
library, an
What are ways for other folks to help? (If possible)
On Friday, November 15, 2013, Austin Seipp wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I apologize if you didn't get the notice I sent last week on the update.
>
> Right now I am endlessly battling windows, and while I actually DO
> have a dynamic GHC working for
I did get it. And I certainly appreciate that there's a lot of work
happening. I just didn't see any answers to my date-related questions in it.
Thanks.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Austin Seipp wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I apologize if you didn't get the notice I sent last week on the updat
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Austin Seipp wrote:
> - Nov 1st: Cut branch, and I plan on making a 7.8 RC1 available the
> same day, for several platforms.
>
Hi, Austin -
Thanks for writing this up.
One of the factors that's blocking my ability to build Hackage packages is
that Hackage does
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> One of the factors that's blocking my ability to build Hackage packages is
> that Hackage does not contain versions of a number of bundled-with-GHC
> packages that have versions matching the versions shipping with HEAD. It
> would unblock t
Indeed. There's a few straggling things but overall we're in feature
freeze overall right now, right?
On Wednesday, October 9, 2013, Johan Tibell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan
> >
> wrote:
> > One of the factors that's blocking my ability to build Hackage packages
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
