More like abandoned backport attempt :D
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 7:29 PM Andreas Klebinger
wrote:
> Yes, only changing the rule did indeed cause regressions.
> Whichwhen not including the string changes. I don't think it's worth
> having one without the other.
>
> But it seems you already
Yes, only changing the rule did indeed cause regressions.
Whichwhen not including the string changes. I don't think it's worth
having one without the other.
But it seems you already backported this?
See https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/5263
Cheers
Andreas
Am 22/03/2021 um
Thanks! I’ll make sure not to forget that one.
I’m afraid 8.10 will be delayed yet again a bit
as we find ourselves in docker purgatory.
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 2:18 PM, Phyx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I currently have https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/5055
> marked for backports but
Hi,
I currently have https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/5055
marked for backports but don't know if it was done or not.
Thanks,
Tamar
Sent from my Mobile
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021, 04:33 Moritz Angermann
wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Does anyone have any backports they'd like to see for
The commit message from
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/commit/f10d11fa49fa9a7a506c4fdbdf86521c2a8d3495
,
makes the changes to string seem required. Applying the commit on its own
doesn't apply cleanly and pulls in quite a
bit of extra dependent commits. Just applying the elem rules appears
Thanks, that makes it less appealing. In the original thread, I got no
further replies after my email announcing my "discovery" of that commit, so
I thought that was the whole story.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021, 13:53 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 12:39:28PM +0800, Gergő Érdi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 12:39:28PM +0800, Gergő Érdi wrote:
> I'd love to have this in a GHC 8.10 release:
> https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2021-March/019629.html
This is already in 9.0, 9.2 and master, but it is a rather non-trivial
change, given all the new work that went into the
I'd love to have this in a GHC 8.10 release:
https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2021-March/019629.html
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021, 12:34 Moritz Angermann
wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Does anyone have any backports they'd like to see for consideration for
> 8.10.5?
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
>
Hi there!
Does anyone have any backports they'd like to see for consideration for
8.10.5?
Cheers,
Moritz
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
