tl;dr: Now that ghc (the library) doesn't depend on Cabal (the library),
can we remove Cabal from the global package database installed with GHC?
A problem that comes up quite a bit for users of GHC is conflicting package
versions versus the version of a package that shipped with GHC. Some
Hello Michael,
On 2014-12-31 at 15:10:37 +0100, Michael Snoyman wrote:
tl;dr: Now that ghc (the library) doesn't depend on Cabal (the library),
can we remove Cabal from the global package database installed with GHC?
[...]
For both of these reasons, I think we should limit the number of
On Wed Dec 31 2014 at 4:25:12 PM Herbert Valerio Riedel hvrie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 2014-12-31 at 15:10:37 +0100, Michael Snoyman wrote:
tl;dr: Now that ghc (the library) doesn't depend on Cabal (the library),
can we remove Cabal from the global package database installed
Hi Herbert,
On 31 December 2014 at 15:25, Herbert Valerio Riedel hvrie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 2014-12-31 at 15:10:37 +0100, Michael Snoyman wrote:
tl;dr: Now that ghc (the library) doesn't depend on Cabal (the library),
can we remove Cabal from the global package database