On 05/19/2015 08:33 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2015, 07:27 +0100 schrieb Mateusz Kowalczyk:
>> On 05/19/2015 06:46 AM, Daniel Peebles wrote:
>>> Don't Nix builds all happen in a randomly generated temporary directory by
>>> default? Then you just copy to $out in i
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2015, 07:27 +0100 schrieb Mateusz Kowalczyk:
> On 05/19/2015 06:46 AM, Daniel Peebles wrote:
> > Don't Nix builds all happen in a randomly generated temporary directory by
> > default? Then you just copy to $out in installPhase. Perhaps stabilizing
> > the build director
On 05/19/2015 06:46 AM, Daniel Peebles wrote:
> Don't Nix builds all happen in a randomly generated temporary directory by
> default? Then you just copy to $out in installPhase. Perhaps stabilizing
> the build directory would help alleviate some of the immediate problems, if
> what Joachim is descr
Don't Nix builds all happen in a randomly generated temporary directory by
default? Then you just copy to $out in installPhase. Perhaps stabilizing
the build directory would help alleviate some of the immediate problems, if
what Joachim is describing affects us too.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:13 P
On 05/14/2015 05:43 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, den 10.05.2015, 19:39 +0100 schrieb Mateusz Kowalczyk:
>> I'd like to bring some attention to ticket #4012 about non-determinism.
>> As many of you may know, the nix package manager distributes binaries
>> throughout its binary
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 10.05.2015, 19:39 +0100 schrieb Mateusz Kowalczyk:
> I'd like to bring some attention to ticket #4012 about non-determinism.
> As many of you may know, the nix package manager distributes binaries
> throughout its binary caches. The binaries are shared as long as the
> hash of
I'd like to add a +1 to getting this fixed. It bites us at work, where exact
binary reproducibility of builds is strongly desirable.
Regards,
Malcolm
On 14 May 2015, at 17:38, George Colpitts wrote:
> Currently the priority of #4012 is normal, shouldn't it be at least high?
> Also the mil
Currently the priority of #4012 is normal, shouldn't it be at least high?
Also the milestone is 7.12.1, should it be 7.10.2?
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to bring some attention to ticket #4012 about non-determinism.
> As many of you may know, the
Hi,
I'd like to bring some attention to ticket #4012 about non-determinism.
As many of you may know, the nix package manager distributes binaries
throughout its binary caches. The binaries are shared as long as the
hash of some of their inputs matches: this means that we can end up with
two of the
