:16
| To: Simon Peyton Jones
| Cc: Austin Seipp; Richard Eisenberg; ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Phab vs. Trac
|
| I had no idea about it either; Herbert made me aware of it.
|
| There is a mapping of the 'interwiki syntax' we can use here:
|
| https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki
Hi all,
Sometimes, the progress on a particular issue is tracked both on Trac and on
Phab. What posts should go where? I know Austin is trying to get Trac to be
notified when a relevant post happens on Phab -- great. But, if I have a
comment, where should I put it?
Here is my proposed answer:
| Here is my proposed answer: The Phab reviews are a good place for code-
| specific commentary/feedback but Trac is better for design issues. A rule
| of thumb might be to pretend that Phab comments are all forgotten in a
| month or two, whereas Trac comments are expected to be around in 5 years.
: Phab vs. Trac
|
| | Here is my proposed answer: The Phab reviews are a good place for code-
| | specific commentary/feedback but Trac is better for design issues. A
| rule
| | of thumb might be to pretend that Phab comments are all forgotten in a
| | month or two, whereas Trac comments
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Richard Eisenberg e...@cis.upenn.edu wrote:
Hi all,
Sometimes, the progress on a particular issue is tracked both on Trac and on
Phab. What posts should go where? I know Austin is trying to get Trac to be
notified when a relevant post happens on Phab --
| Look at the top - there is a link to 'Phab:D69', which is the
| differential revision hyperlinked properly.
|
| If you use this syntax in Trac now, it will automatically hyperlink
| revisions. Perhaps in the future we can shorten it to just 'D69' for
| example. But this syntax works now to
