Very interesting, that would suggest there is some improvement in build
times.
I want to test out compile times with each of those compilers on our
pathological worst case dependency amazonka (
https://github.com/brendanhay/amazonka)
and a library we've built on top of it mismi (
https://github.co
That's great news! Faster than GHC 7.8! We should advertise this :-).
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Christopher Allen
| Sent: 16 May 2017 19:09
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: 8.2 and earlier build times
|
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
wrote:
> That's great news! Faster than GHC 7.8! We should advertise this :-).
However, not everything is back to 7.8 levels when looking at the
time-dimension, e.g. for regex-tdfa-1.2.2 (with reasonably similar
versions of de
Herbert Valerio Riedel writes:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
> wrote:
>> That's great news! Faster than GHC 7.8! We should advertise this :-).
>
> However, not everything is back to 7.8 levels when looking at the
> time-dimension, e.g. for regex-tdfa-1.2
Ben Gamari writes:
snip
>
> The "normal" and "profiled" build metrics are the +RTS -t lines extract
> from Cabal's profiled and unprofiled GHC invocations. I believe the
> RTS timings for 8.0.2 are broken due to a (fixed) RTS bug, although I
> can't come up with a reference at the moment.
>
>
I t
Jones
|
| Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: 8.2 and earlier build times
|
| Ben Gamari writes:
|
| snip
| >
| > The "normal" and "profiled" build metrics are the +RTS -t lines
| > extract from Cabal's profiled and unprofiled GHC invocations. I
|
Simon Peyton Jones writes:
> | We'll need to look at what is going on here as this is a pretty
> | significant regression.
>
> Make a ticket with repro instructions?
>
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/13745
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
