Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-11-17 Thread Ben Gamari
Ben Gamari writes: > Hello GHCers, > > Thanks to the work of darchon the last blocker for the 8.0.2 release > (#12479) has nearly been resolved. After the fix has been merged I'll be > doing some further testing of the ghc-8.0 branch and cut a source > tarball for 8.0.2-rc1 later this week. > > I

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-11-14 Thread Boespflug, Mathieu
Ok many thanks for the heads up Ben. I'll let Facundo coordinate from here, regarding #12777. -- Mathieu Boespflug Founder at http://tweag.io. On 14 November 2016 at 23:28, Ben Gamari wrote: > "Boespflug, Mathieu" writes: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > still a few tickets, most of them with patches, sl

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-11-14 Thread Ben Gamari
"Boespflug, Mathieu" writes: > Hi Ben, > > still a few tickets, most of them with patches, slated for the 8.0.2 > milestone: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/GHC-8.0.2. Is the > plan still to merge those in? > There was one patch that was mistakenly in patch state which I cleared up.

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-11-14 Thread Boespflug, Mathieu
Hi Ben, still a few tickets, most of them with patches, slated for the 8.0.2 milestone: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/GHC-8.0.2. Is the plan still to merge those in? https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12777 is particularly important for inline-java. Many thanks, -- Mathieu B

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-11-14 Thread Ben Gamari
Yitzchak Gale writes: > Ben, I see #12757 is now fixed and closed. Great! > > What's the prognosis now for a release? > I'm just waiting for a release of filepath and then one more round of tests and then I should have a source release ready. This release has been a bit of a perpetual trainwreck

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-11-14 Thread Yitzchak Gale
Ben, I see #12757 is now fixed and closed. Great! What's the prognosis now for a release? Thanks, Yitz On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Ben Gamari wrote: > George Colpitts writes: > >> Hi >> >> Where are we on this? 12479 was last updated 5 days ago and it is not clear >> who has the next acti

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-10-25 Thread Ben Gamari
George Colpitts writes: > Hi > > Where are we on this? 12479 was last updated 5 days ago and it is not clear > who has the next action. > Unfortunately The merge of #12479 took longer than expected and soon thereafter yet another terrible bug has reared its ugly head. See #12757. I'm trying to wo

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-10-20 Thread George Colpitts
Hi Where are we on this? 12479 was last updated 5 days ago and it is not clear who has the next action. Thanks George On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:43 AM Ben Gamari wrote: > Hello GHCers, > > Thanks to the work of darchon the last blocker for the 8.0.2 release > (#12479) has nearly been resolved.

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-10-04 Thread Matthew Pickering
uld be > good. > > > > Simon > > > > From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Boespflug, > Mathieu > Sent: 04 October 2016 07:59 > To: Ben Gamari > Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org > Subject: Re: GHC 8.0.2 status > > > > Hi Be

RE: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-10-04 Thread Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
: ghc-devs@haskell.org Subject: Re: GHC 8.0.2 status Hi Ben, while in the eye of the cyclone, as we're waiting for these last few OS X issues to clear up... I was wondering, do you currently have a means to "vet" release candidates before cutting a new release? More to the point,

Re: GHC 8.0.2 status

2016-10-03 Thread Boespflug, Mathieu
Hi Ben, while in the eye of the cyclone, as we're waiting for these last few OS X issues to clear up... I was wondering, do you currently have a means to "vet" release candidates before cutting a new release? More to the point, to check that a point release like these doesn't include any breaking