Re: Today's validate failures

2013-02-14 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:42:33AM +, Simon Marlow wrote: > > Unexpected failures: >perf/haddock haddock.Cabal [stat not good enough] (normal) >perf/haddock haddock.base [stat not good enough] (normal) I'd guess these were broken by commit c3c9babf10990c

RE: Today's validate failures

2013-02-14 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
I've just pushed fixes to the non-perf ones. | -Original Message- | From: ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] | On Behalf Of Simon Marlow | Sent: 14 February 2013 10:43 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Today's validate failures | | On x86_64/Linux: | |

Re: Today's validate failures

2013-01-30 Thread Simon Marlow
On 30/01/13 01:20, Ian Lynagh wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:03:26PM +, Simon Marlow wrote: On 18/01/13 16:45, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | > In Packages we have a dflags with an error thunk in it for pkgState, | and it's the strict evaluation of that pkgState that is changing the | behav

Re: Today's validate failures

2013-01-29 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:03:26PM +, Simon Marlow wrote: > On 18/01/13 16:45, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > >| > In Packages we have a dflags with an error thunk in it for pkgState, > >| and it's the strict evaluation of that pkgState that is changing the > >| behaviour. > >| > >| Whereabouts ar

Re: Today's validate failures

2013-01-24 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:42:31PM +, Simon Marlow wrote: > On 24/01/13 13:37, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > >T1133 and T1133A both work for me (Linux). > > They only fail with a non-fast validate (BTW) Sorry, I've fixed these. Thanks Ian ___ ghc-

Re: Today's validate failures

2013-01-24 Thread Simon Marlow
On 24/01/13 13:37, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: T1133 and T1133A both work for me (Linux). They only fail with a non-fast validate (BTW) Cheers, Simon T7594 is a glitch; I failed to push. Simon | -Original Message- | From: ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-boun.

RE: Today's validate failures

2013-01-24 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
T1133 and T1133A both work for me (Linux). T7594 is a glitch; I failed to push. Simon | -Original Message- | From: ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] | On Behalf Of Simon Marlow | Sent: 24 January 2013 09:57 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Today's v

Re: Today's validate failures

2013-01-18 Thread Simon Marlow
On 18/01/13 16:45, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | > In Packages we have a dflags with an error thunk in it for pkgState, | and it's the strict evaluation of that pkgState that is changing the | behaviour. | | Whereabouts are we evaluating it? Could we fix that instead? That would be good. It's he

RE: Today's validate failures

2013-01-18 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| > In Packages we have a dflags with an error thunk in it for pkgState, | and it's the strict evaluation of that pkgState that is changing the | behaviour. | | Whereabouts are we evaluating it? Could we fix that instead? That would be good. It's here; applyPackageFlag dflags unusable pkgs fla

Re: Today's validate failures

2013-01-18 Thread Simon Marlow
09 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Today's validate failures | | On 18/01/13 14:50, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | > I have no idea what the cabal ones are. They report | > +ghc-stage2: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) | > + (GHC version 7.7 f

RE: Today's validate failures

2013-01-18 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
not actually wrong. Simon | -Original Message- | From: Simon Marlow [mailto:marlo...@gmail.com] | Sent: 18 January 2013 15:09 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Today's validate failures | | On 18/01/13 14:50, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | > I have n

Re: Today's validate failures

2013-01-18 Thread Simon Marlow
On 18/01/13 14:50, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: I have no idea what the cabal ones are. They report +ghc-stage2: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) + (GHC version 7.7 for x86_64-unknown-linux): + no package state yet: call GHC.setSessionDynFlags This happens when something touches pkgState

RE: Today's validate failures

2013-01-18 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
I have no idea what the cabal ones are. They report +ghc-stage2: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) + (GHC version 7.7 for x86_64-unknown-linux): + no package state yet: call GHC.setSessionDynFlags I've fixed rnfail055, T4201 (my fault sorry). haddock.base is ok for me. Simon | -Orig

Re: Today's validate failures

2013-01-18 Thread Simon Marlow
On 18/01/13 11:53, Simon Marlow wrote: I have several validate failures today: Unexpected failures: cabal1750 [bad stderr] (normal) cabalshadow [bad stderr] (normal) perf/haddock haddock.base [sta

Re: Today's validate failures

2013-01-18 Thread Jan Stolarek
Don't know if that helps in tracking the problem, but I have a build from 81f4cd3e08996d35b3a70dfee4d70a829f2f2622 (24 hours ago) and these tests also fail (haddock.base causes framework failure). Janek ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org