OK I've pushed that change.
S
From: Richard Eisenberg [mailto:e...@cis.upenn.edu]
Sent: 17 June 2015 14:42
To: Simon Peyton Jones
Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Re: Validate failures on 7.10 branch
On Jun 17, 2015, at 8:00 AM, Simon Peyton Jones
mailto:simo...@microsoft.com>> wr
On Jun 17, 2015, at 8:00 AM, Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
> On a fresh build of the 7.10 branch, I get five validate failures on Linux.
> They are below. Is this only me?
>
>typecheck/should_fail T10534 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
>
>
That's probably my fault. As long as the file doesn't
Sorry about that, fixed and pushed in aede2d6bbc168724409267c3e08887f7289d22be!
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Dear Release branch managers,
>
> may I remind you of this small merge request? It would help cut down
> noise from Travis, and help me catch real errors more
Dear Release branch managers,
may I remind you of this small merge request? It would help cut down
noise from Travis, and help me catch real errors more easily:
Am Sonntag, den 18.05.2014, 20:54 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> a small reminder to the masteres of the stable branch: The ghc-7.8
>
Hi,
a small reminder to the masteres of the stable branch: The ghc-7.8
branch currently still does not validate on Travis:
Am Samstag, den 03.05.2014, 22:08 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> ghc-7.8:
>
> Unexpected failures:
>annotations/should_compile/th annth_compunits [bad exit code] (no
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of 2014-05-07 00:27:29 -0700:
> Hi,
>
> I’m still seeing these failures. Am I the only one?
I'm seeing them.
Edward
> Am Samstag, den 03.05.2014, 22:08 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> > I’m seeing these failures on travis. Anyone feeling responsible?
>
Hi,
I’m still seeing these failures. Am I the only one?
Am Samstag, den 03.05.2014, 22:08 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> I’m seeing these failures on travis. Anyone feeling responsible?
>
> master:
> *** unexpected failure for cc004(normal)
> *** unexpected failure for cgrun05
| Finally, simpl015 is a test that does only sometimes fail. It uses on
| my box an estimated 2GB of memory, and when I haven't anything else
| memory-hungry running, it passes, but when I have (as I do by default)
| SeaMonkey running (with tons of open tabs), my box quasi-freezes, the
| test time
| The T8333 failure is due to it reading my .ghci file, thus getting
| additional output. Is there a way to automatically check that all tests
| that use the "--interactive" flag also use "-ignore-dot-ghci" like the
| ghci tests do, or must one wait for validate failures due to that and
| add it th
I am still getting performance failures from haddock. I'm accepting new numbers
as expected
values - if it breaks these tests on other machinges please complain.
Janek
Dnia wtorek, 8 października 2013, Simon Marlow napisał:
> From a validate run just now on x86_64/Linux:
>
> Unexpected failure
yes validiating now
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Simon
| Marlow
| Sent: 08 October 2013 17:00
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Validate failures
|
| From a validate run just now on x86_64/Linux:
|
| Unexpected failures:
|
Yes, sorry about that. I was trying to do too much yesterday, and hence setting
a bad example :-(. Fixed now.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Austin
| Seipp
| Sent: 02 October 2013 07:06
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject
Simon mailed this yesterday:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2013-October/002701.html
Janek
Dnia środa, 2 października 2013, Austin Seipp napisał:
> Today, validate has been failing with:
>
> $ cat testsuite_summary.txt
>
> Unexpected results from:
> TEST="T7873 haddock.compiler haddoc
Great, thanks!
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Fixed atomicinc too.
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
> On 22/08/13 19:58, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
>> Sorry! Just pushed the fix. atomicinc was also failing for me, I
>> assumed it was nothing to do with me. Perhaps not. I'l
Fixed atomicinc too.
Cheers,
Simon
On 22/08/13 19:58, Simon Marlow wrote:
Sorry! Just pushed the fix. atomicinc was also failing for me, I
assumed it was nothing to do with me. Perhaps not. I'll look into it.
Cheers,
Simon
On 22/08/13 19:35, Austin Seipp wrote:
Simon,
While
Sorry! Just pushed the fix. atomicinc was also failing for me, I
assumed it was nothing to do with me. Perhaps not. I'll look into it.
Cheers,
Simon
On 22/08/13 19:35, Austin Seipp wrote:
Simon,
While validating the changes for #8144, I noticed there were several
failures that see
Many of those look familiar to the validation failures I've seen on Mac OS
X. Some are in Kazu Yamamoto's list too:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2013-May/001163.html
Shot in the dark: does this indicate a dynamic linking issue?
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
wro
Should be fixed now, I think, except T5113 which really is a genuine old bug. I
have a fix coming
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Simon Marlow [mailto:marlo...@gmail.com]
| Sent: 07 February 2013 10:14
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Validate
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:37:13PM +, José Pedro Magalhães wrote:
>
> Which is weird; getPermissions is saying that the file
> "getPermissions001.hs" is executable.
> But, then again, the file system is a mounted shared folder from NTFS,
I suspect that all files in that filesystem appear to b
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> > And getPermissions001 might or might not have to do with the fact that
> this
> > is on
> > a virtual machine...
>
> What platform are you on, and how is it failing?
>
I'm on Ubuntu 32bit running as guest OS on Win7 64bit. It fails as follo
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:34:51AM +, José Pedro Magalhães wrote:
>
> But then again, looking at it, I'm not sure what to do about the perf ones.
> Should
> we be more flexible in the expected result, or should I have fewer
> expectations
> about my machine being representative?
I'm in the mi
I'm very sorry about this. I have been utterly flattened this week.
S
| -Original Message-
| From: Simon Marlow [mailto:marlo...@gmail.com]
| Sent: 07 February 2013 10:14
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Validate failures
|
| These are
For what it's worth, I got these failures with sh validate --fast in HEAD
this morning:
Unexpected failures:
../../libraries/directory/tests getPermissions001 [bad stdout] (normal)
perf/compilerT1969 [stat too good] (normal)
perf/compilerT3294 [sta
These are still failing, BTW.
Cheers,
Simon
On 01/02/13 14:51, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
yes, see earlier email on this. almost certainly my fault, will fix Monday
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On
| Behalf Of
yes, see earlier email on this. almost certainly my fault, will fix Monday
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On
| Behalf Of Simon Marlow
| Sent: 01 February 2013 08:57
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Validate failure
I think I'm implicated here though I believe I did push testsuite patches.
I'll check tomorrow. Except that I'm out all day. Argh. Anyway don't worry
about them. Sorry
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On
| Behal
Sorry about this, I only tried the "typecheck" tests---I'll make sure to
run a more complete validation before pusing changes.
-Iavor
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
wrote:
> Consequences of Iavor's fundep changes. I have pushed fixes
>
> S
>
> | -Original Message-
>
Consequences of Iavor's fundep changes. I have pushed fixes
S
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org]
| On Behalf Of Simon Marlow
| Sent: 16 January 2013 14:38
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: validate failures
|
| Lots
28 matches
Mail list logo
