Re: Non-deterministic package IDs are really bad in 7.10

2015-05-19 Thread Mateusz Kowalczyk
On 05/19/2015 06:46 AM, Daniel Peebles wrote: Don't Nix builds all happen in a randomly generated temporary directory by default? Then you just copy to $out in installPhase. Perhaps stabilizing the build directory would help alleviate some of the immediate problems, if what Joachim is

Re: Non-deterministic package IDs are really bad in 7.10

2015-05-18 Thread Mateusz Kowalczyk
On 05/14/2015 05:43 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi, Am Sonntag, den 10.05.2015, 19:39 +0100 schrieb Mateusz Kowalczyk: I'd like to bring some attention to ticket #4012 about non-determinism. As many of you may know, the nix package manager distributes binaries throughout its binary caches.

Re: Non-deterministic package IDs are really bad in 7.10

2015-05-14 Thread Malcolm Wallace
I'd like to add a +1 to getting this fixed. It bites us at work, where exact binary reproducibility of builds is strongly desirable. Regards, Malcolm On 14 May 2015, at 17:38, George Colpitts wrote: Currently the priority of #4012 is normal, shouldn't it be at least high? Also the

Re: Non-deterministic package IDs are really bad in 7.10

2015-05-14 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 10.05.2015, 19:39 +0100 schrieb Mateusz Kowalczyk: I'd like to bring some attention to ticket #4012 about non-determinism. As many of you may know, the nix package manager distributes binaries throughout its binary caches. The binaries are shared as long as the hash of

Re: Non-deterministic package IDs are really bad in 7.10

2015-05-14 Thread George Colpitts
Currently the priority of #4012 is normal, shouldn't it be at least high? Also the milestone is 7.12.1, should it be 7.10.2? On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk fuuze...@fuuzetsu.co.uk wrote: Hi, I'd like to bring some attention to ticket #4012 about non-determinism. As many