On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Peter Wortmann wrote:
>
> Nathan Howell wrote:
>> I did get a language ID assigned a couple years ago, it should be in DWARF
>> 5.
>>
>> Accepted: DW_LANG_Haskell assigned value 0x18. -- April 18.2012
>
> Nice work. We'll start using that one then :)
Great!
-- Jo
Nathan Howell wrote:
> I did get a language ID assigned a couple years ago, it should be in DWARF
> 5.
>
> Accepted: DW_LANG_Haskell assigned value 0x18. -- April 18.2012
Nice work. We'll start using that one then :)
Greetings,
Peter Wortmann
__
I did get a language ID assigned a couple years ago, it should be in DWARF
5.
Accepted: DW_LANG_Haskell assigned value 0x18. -- April 18.2012
http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=120218.1
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Peter Wortman
[copy of the dropped reply, for anybody interested]
Johan Tibell wrote:
> I enjoyed reading your paper [1] and I have some questions.
Thanks! The DWARF patches are currently under review for Trac #3693. Any
feedback would be very appreciated:
https://github.com/scpmw/ghc/commits/profiling-import
Johan Tibell wrote:
> Do we follow the best practices here:
> http://wiki.dwarfstd.org/index.php?title=Best_Practices
Not quite sure what exactly you are referring to, here's the current
state:
> For DW_TAG_compilation_unit and DW_TAG_partial_unit DIEs, the name
> attribute should contain the p
Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> Or he's not subscribed to this list and his messages do not come through
Ah thanks, that's probably it. I accumulated lots of error mails from
the mailing list, which however didn't mention subscribing. Sorry about
the confusion...
Greetings,
Peter Wortmann
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> Or he's not subscribed to this list and his messages do not come through
Ah yes. From my end I can see that he tried to CC the mailing list,
but I missed that the messages didn't get through.
___
Or he's not subscribed to this list and his messages do not come through
* Austin Seipp [2014-02-28 09:53:31-0600]
> (Passive note - this conversation looks like Johan talking to himself,
> as I suspect Peter is not 'reply all'-ing to the developers list. So
> other people may be a tad lost.)
>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Austin Seipp wrote:
> (Passive note - this conversation looks like Johan talking to himself,
> as I suspect Peter is not 'reply all'-ing to the developers list. So
> other people may be a tad lost.)
Nope, this is just me having a stream of consciousness discussion
(Passive note - this conversation looks like Johan talking to himself,
as I suspect Peter is not 'reply all'-ing to the developers list. So
other people may be a tad lost.)
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:
> Yes another question while I have you on the line. :)
>
> Do we follo
Yes another question while I have you on the line. :)
Do we follow the best practices here:
http://wiki.dwarfstd.org/index.php?title=Best_Practices
-- Johan
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Peter Wortmann wrote:
> Johan Tibell wrote:> Lets try to get our name standardized and pushed into
> GDB. It's
> > hopefully as simple as sending an email to the GDB devs.
>
> Strictly speaking standardization is the job of the DWARF format
> committee, which seem
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Peter Wortmann wrote:
>
> Johan Tibell wrote:
> > I enjoyed reading your paper [1] and I have some questions.
>
> Thanks! The DWARF patches are currently under review for Trac #3693. Any
> feedback would be very appreciated:
> https://github.com/scpmw/ghc/commits/
Hi!
(I've CCed ghc-devs on this email, as I think the question is of general
interest.)
I enjoyed reading your paper [1] and I have some questions.
* What does the generated DWARF information look like? For example, will
you fill in the .debug_line section so that standard tools like "perf
repo
14 matches
Mail list logo
