On 24/11/2014 11:12, Yuras Shumovich wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 10:09 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 14/11/2014 21:23, Yuras Shumovich wrote:
I was reviewing some exception handling code in base library, and I
found this line:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:53 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 24/11/2014 11:12, Yuras Shumovich wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 10:09 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 14/11/2014 21:23, Yuras Shumovich wrote:
I was reviewing some exception handling code in base library, and I
found this line:
On 25/11/2014 14:03, Yuras Shumovich wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:53 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 24/11/2014 11:12, Yuras Shumovich wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 10:09 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 14/11/2014 21:23, Yuras Shumovich wrote:
I was reviewing some exception handling code in
On 14/11/2014 21:23, Yuras Shumovich wrote:
I was reviewing some exception handling code in base library, and I
found this line:
https://phabricator.haskell.org/diffusion/GHC/browse/master/libraries/base/Control/Concurrent/QSem.hs;165072b334ebb2ccbef38a963ac4d126f1e08c96$74
Here mask is used,
On 14/11/2014 21:30, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Yuras Shumovich shumovi...@gmail.com
mailto:shumovi...@gmail.com wrote:
Here mask is used, but I looks completely useless for me. waitQSem
itself should be called with async exceptions masked, otherwise there
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 10:09 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 14/11/2014 21:23, Yuras Shumovich wrote:
I was reviewing some exception handling code in base library, and I
found this line:
Hello,
I was reviewing some exception handling code in base library, and I
found this line:
https://phabricator.haskell.org/diffusion/GHC/browse/master/libraries/base/Control/Concurrent/QSem.hs;165072b334ebb2ccbef38a963ac4d126f1e08c96$74
Here mask is used, but I looks completely useless for me.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Yuras Shumovich shumovi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here mask is used, but I looks completely useless for me. waitQSem
itself should be called with async exceptions masked, otherwise there is
no way to prevent resource leak.
Do anyone know why mask is used here?
I
On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 16:30 -0500, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Yuras Shumovich shumovi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here mask is used, but I looks completely useless for me. waitQSem
itself should be called with async exceptions masked, otherwise there is
no way to
