On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 11:12:28PM +0100, Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, but i believe that distribution is a nice thing to have, e.g. to be
That's exactly why I mentioned MCOP. You still didn't read the
documentation? It is very easy to find out that MCOP ist just as
distributed as
I emailed this to Mr. Kimball (!) but I thought I would post it here too for whoever
can apply the patch. It's really small so here goes..
Sorry for the patch on the mailing list..
Chuck
header.patch.gz
Marc Lehmann wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 01:58:06AM +0100, Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > protocol for communication between plug-ins and Gimp that are all
> > running on the same machine, you are free to choose any non standard
> > protocol you like.
>
> It's free software. Y
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 04:51:43PM +, Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > nobody understands the dependencies anymore.
>
> I think that's the end of any useful technical discussion. I will look
Nick, we would have a lot less rpoblems if you just tried to communicate
instead of bumping a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-02-24 at 1505.31 +0100):
> Seems my mail setup is broken. sending this the third time to the list...
If you were getting a HELO cmd refused or similar, it was a
overzealous antispam policy of list bot. Solved now.
GSR
___
Gimp
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:49:18PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> I know very well what's causing this.
The previous day, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> nobody understands the dependencies anymore.
I think that's the end of any useful technical discussion. I will look
at fixing the i18n problem on the wire
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:16:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> COW is indeed a good thing. However I assume you address the mentioned
> memory overhead with your answer and I'm not sure how you would avoid
> it with copy-on-write.
You're completely right. It was a thinko on my part, I ha
Hm, seems I've sent that mail to the old address before ...
---
Hi all,
Nathan C Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 21 Feb 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Nathan C Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Problem: Many tools instruct the core to destroy thems
