> The basic problem is that if every plug-in was included in the
> distribution, it would be huge. No solution has yet been found for
> dealing with this problem.
Who cares about the size.Everybody wants a lot of plugins !
Gimp without Gallery Maker for instance is completely unuseful for a large
Hi,
Thomas RIBO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > - average() and variency both use a wrong index into the data
> > array thus accessing the wrong data. Your loops should go from
> > 0 to width/height, not from x to x + width, resp. y to y + height
>
> Ok for this. I couldn't know.
well, yes
Hi,
Fabian Frédérick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The basic problem is that if every plug-in was included in the
> > distribution, it would be huge. No solution has yet been found for
> > dealing with this problem.
> Who cares about the size.Everybody wants a lot of plugins !
I don't think
Hi,
Fabian Frédérick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If help with XSLT is wanted, btw, I'd be happy to write some stylesheets
> > (that would be part of my personal "starting to work in gimp again"
> > campaign ;)
> IMHO XML could be appreciated in both data/log features as well.Btw, I
> release
We were just having a small discussion on irc that really should be
discussed here, so I will get it started.
Overall, the script and plug-in collection need to be cleaned up.
First, it needs to be determined what plug-ins still have active
maintainers. If someone out there is bored, it would
Hi there,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:10:34PM +0100, Rebecca J. Walter wrote:
> Plug-ins probably also need to be grouped into smaller pieces, probably
> in terms of use. (people who use plug-in z probably also want plug-in
> y). This will increase the burden of release, but make things availabl
Hi,
"Rebecca J. Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First, it needs to be determined what plug-ins still have active
> maintainers. If someone out there is bored, it would be a good idea to
> go through all the plug-ins and contact the listed maintainer to see if
> they plan to continue maint
"Adam D. Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've spent a bazillion hours this year on partial rewrites
> of the INDEXED->RGB quantization, mostly to improve quality
> but partly to abstract the code away from its RGB8-centricity.
>
> It's all been off-tree however until I thought it was ready;
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I've attached a pretty trivial patch which creates Erode and
> Dilate menu items. These are basically the vpropagate plug-in
> called with default values. This stems from me spending about an
> hour looking for this functionality today and not
Hi Adam,
as I already told you in a private mail, I took the GIF saving and loading
code from GIMP and used it for another small project. I ended up with two
files that encapsulate the GIF routines and hide them behind a simple
API. Would you object if I try to merge that code back into GIMP-1.3
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 01:01:23PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Why don't you just go ahead and commit this patch? We actually
> have the problem that many plug-ins' menu entries are awfully
> misleading and weird. "Erode" and "Dilate" *are* actually useful
> names so they shoould be there IMH
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:53:30AM +0100, Fabian Fr?d?rick wrote:
> Who cares about the size.Everybody wants a lot of plugins !
Lots of us care about the size.
--
I love catnip mice.
It's why I chew their heads off.
They're goo
On the subject of erode and dilate, I've written plug-ins that do these
and Minkowski open and close. They are a little more traditional in
their approach, i.e. give the user a 3X3 matrix from which to build a
mask for the operation. I need to do a bit of clean-up with them, but I
expect to post
At 07:12 PM 12/5/2001 -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>Gimp-print generates the HTML (and .pdf, and .ps) manuals at packaging
>time.
Do keep in mind that using Gnome-Print to generate the PDF files
will give you "flat" documents (ie. no hyperlinks, bookmarks, etc.) which
are VERY USEFUL
Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 01:01:23PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> > Why don't you just go ahead and commit this patch? We actually
> > have the problem that many plug-ins' menu entries are awfully
> > misleading and weird. "Erode" and "Dilate" *are
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miles O'Neal) writes:
> Sven Neumann said...
>
> |It would really help if someone would go through the hassle of adding
> |more documentation to libgimp. I would help with gtk-doc questions
> |but I don't have time to do the full job...
>
> If someone will suggest a good
Way back in January I submitted a patch to add DESTDIR support to
gimptool, primarily for using it in Makefiles, as you can't install a
plugin to any location except it's final destination. This prevents
installing it into an alternate location, for example when packaging it
for Debian. I regard
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 10:36:50PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That was my general idea. I can see that it has disadvantages (as
> > you mention, back-compatibility and needing to do lots of stuff
> > in the core are two). That parasites are supported i
18 matches
Mail list logo
