[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP Plug-In Template 1.3.0

2003-03-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I'd like to announce the availability of version 1.3.0 of the GIMP Plug-In Template at ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/plugin-template/ This is a development release targetted at plug-in developers that want to create a plug-in for the development version of The GIMP. You will not need this

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP Plug-In Template 1.3.0

2003-03-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nice work! Is there any chance that this could be licensed BSD/X11-style to encourage its adoption as the base for non-GPL plugins too? Mitch and me don't see any problem to relicense gimp-plugin-template. Should perhaps even be something w/o an

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP Plug-In Template 1.3.0

2003-03-06 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On 06 Mar 2003 18:47:12 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nice work! Is there any chance that this could be licensed BSD/X11-style to encourage its adoption as the base for non-GPL plugins too? Mitch and me don't see any problem to

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP Plug-In Template 1.3.0

2003-03-06 Thread Adam D. Moss
Raphaël Quinet wrote: I'd suggest dual licensing: 1 - old-style BSD with advertising clause 2 - GPL or LGPL I was in the process of moving the code to the following XFree-style license if that's okay. I don't see the utility in dual-licensing since either of the above can trivially subsume the

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP Plug-In Template 1.3.0

2003-03-06 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On 06 Mar 2003 18:47:12 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] And I replied some silly things... Hmmm... Looks like I misread Sven's message. I thought that you wanted the option of having a license _with_ advertising clause. I did not see the o in w/o. Silly me! So of course