On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, there is no need to change this at all, I was just under
> > the wrong impression that it was dangerous to enable them *at all*,
> > and not "dangerous to enable them because I often bump my head on
> > t
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:21:10PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You obviously did not understand the reasoning behind this change.
Obviusly not, since only you explained it so far, saying that it clashes
with gtk+.
> With the use of mnemonics in 1.3 the chance to make such a m
Hi,
writes:
> However, there is no need to change this at all, I was just under
> the wrong impression that it was dangerous to enable them *at all*,
> and not "dangerous to enable them because I often bump my head on
> the caps at the wrong time" :)
Well, we plan to add more mnemonics to the m
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:02:41AM -0300, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know how much it's dictated by gtk2, but it seens weird that the
> GIMP usability gets hurt for changes on The Gimp Toolkit.
Woaw, that sounding like a great argument, but I still think that gtk+
des
MoinMoin,
I promised not to wait too long with the next release because of all
the nifty new features you have been waiting for. So here it is, grab
your copy from
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v1.3/v1.3.16/
or from one of the mirrors listed at http://gimp.org/download.html.
Please give the ne
