I don´t know who will be doing it, but it was not until this week that
I noted taht there is no way of printing more than one coppy at once
with the print GUI. Not in 1.2.5 at last (at work is what I use. At
home, I have no wrking printer at the moment)
And also, if it cannot be made possible
Steve Crane wrote:
Hi,
Are there any built-in functions or scripts for the GIMP that can be
used to remove or reduce noise in digital photographs? Does anyone have
a set of steps to follow to remove noise? There are several stand-alone
programs available for Windows that do this but I haven't f
--- Begin Message ---
this gimp was released on December 24 or 25, 2000.
can you stop already talking about the web site.
carol
___
Gimp-web mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web
--- End Message ---
Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-09-26 at 1933.11 +):
I'd suggest to leave the C-R as default keybinding and hardcode the C-S-Z.
sounds like a good option, of course, it would confuse things if a user
wants to apply SH+CT+Z to some other function(not sure w
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:17:56 +0200
From: David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As any of you who have been following CVS know, we have been
working towards a 2.0 pre1 release for the end of this month, and
there are now very few blockers to that release left.
However, there are mor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-09-26 at 2226.34 +0200):
> Grouped undo, or call undo history, ie. Hardcoding would be more
> problem than harm, btw.
Argh! "...problems than help, btw."
GSR
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-09-26 at 1933.11 +):
> >I'd suggest to leave the C-R as default keybinding and hardcode the C-S-Z.
> sounds like a good option, of course, it would confuse things if a user
> wants to apply SH+CT+Z to some other function(not sure why they'd want to,
> but it's possibl
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 21:06:45 +0200, "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was going to reply in almost the exact same way, but Raphael beat
> me to it. So basically this is a 'me too'. The difference would have
> been that I would have cc'ed Yosh, rather than the developers' list.
> :-)
From: Tom Mraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gimp Developer List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Redo shortcut
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:18:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU ([128.32.112.242]) by
mc11-f15.hotmail.com with Microsoft S
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:23:40PM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > I just tried to figure out where to get Windows binaries for 1.3.>=19
> > and couldn't find any. So I tried to search the archives.
> >
> > The archive is
> > a) out of date (last message from July 26)
>
> There is ano
On 26 Sep 2003, at 18:34, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> [Note: I am adding the gimp-developer list to the CC:. For those who
> missed the context of this thread and might be puzzled by some of the
> statements quoted below, the quick summary is that it started with
> Carol telling Niklas that he was
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:22:05 +0200, Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In the current situation, I think it's reasonable to fit in with
> > what others do in the general case, which dynamic shortcuts
> > provide a way to revert to the old behav
[Note: I am adding the gimp-developer list to the CC:. For those who
missed the context of this thread and might be puzzled by some of the
statements quoted below, the quick summary is that it started with
Carol telling Niklas that he was fired from the gimp-web team. Also,
the subject "new w
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:39:44PM +0200, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I'm sure that ergonomy was considered for Photoshop when they
>> > chose Ctrl-Shift-Z for Redo... I do think it's overstating our
>> > importa
On Friday 26 September 2003 7:19 am, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, I have never enve looked at Pango.
>
> You will not get around it, see below.
>
> > My idea would be to get the text chars and attributtes from the
> > GIMP, generate a image
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 01:55:05AM +0200, Branko Collin wrote:
> On 25 Sep 2003, at 23:50, Roman Joost wrote:
>
> I seem to remember though, that somebody (Sven? Nomis?) already put a
> GIMP presentation on the web somewhere.
>
Hm .. yeh - that might be the problem. Everything is somewhere in th
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:22:49PM +0200, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
> > b) not searchable (ht://dig error: "Unable to read configuration file")
>
> Probably related to "a", meanwhile try 'site:lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> gimp term1 term2 ... termN' in Google.
... which doesn't hel
Hi,
"Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I have never enve looked at Pango.
You will not get around it, see below.
> My idea would be to get the text chars and attributtes from the
> GIMP, generate a image without the text only layers with no other
> layers above it, and "hand
Hi all,
As any of you who have been following CVS know, we have been
working towards a 2.0 pre1 release for the end of this month, and
there are now very few blockers to that release left.
However, there are more blockers than are going to be done in the
next week. So we're going to have another
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:18:44PM +, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > You're right. If you could tell me such a program... I would have used
> > it. The nearest approximation was xfractint but it's cumbersome to use
> > and doesn't have a gradient editor (and I'm not sure whether it's
> > capable
20 matches
Mail list logo
