[Gimp-developer] Using gimpwire

2003-12-14 Thread Shrinivas Kulkarni
Can anybody point me to examples about how to use gimpwire lib?   Thanks and regards,Shrinivas Kulkarni.  

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread pcg
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:13:30PM +, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder, could the typical fork() immeditaly followed by exec() (in > the child process) be somehow detected by Cygwin/MSYS, avoiding the > need for emulating the full fork() semantics in this typical case? No, b

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread pcg
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:46:27PM +, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MSYS does not depend on cygwin, BTW. It's entirely standalone. Why do you claim this if a few simple checks could have convinced you otherwise? At least the shell, which is just bash, is linked against the cygwin

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:29:07AM -0800, Manish Singh wrote: > Yeah, gcc is quite slow at compile time, and I think in newer versions > it's gotten slower, not faster. >From the gcc3.4 changes.html: * Precompiled headers are now supported. Precompiled headers can dramatically speed up compilat

Re: [Gimp-developer] Here Be Bounties

2003-12-14 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Sunday 14 December 2003 21:29, Manish Singh wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:24:54PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > > On Sunday 14 December 2003 18:36, Manish Singh wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:41:59PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > > > > Since it talks specifically about GIMP

Re: [Gimp-developer] Here Be Bounties

2003-12-14 Thread Manish Singh
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:24:54PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > On Sunday 14 December 2003 18:36, Manish Singh wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:41:59PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > > > Since it talks specifically about GIMP python, > > > which me, by chance, was trying for the very fir

Re: [Gimp-developer] Here Be Bounties

2003-12-14 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Sunday 14 December 2003 18:36, Manish Singh wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:41:59PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > > Since it talks specifically about GIMP python, > > which me, by chance, was trying for the very first time in gimp > > 1.3 (no kidding --- I've been on gimp 1.2 with my pyth

Re: [Gimp-developer] Here Be Bounties

2003-12-14 Thread Manish Singh
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:41:59PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > > Since it talks specifically about GIMP python, > which me, by chance, was trying for the very first time in gimp 1.3 > (no kidding --- I've been on gimp 1.2 with my python fu stuff so far), > it is interesting to mention that

Re: [Gimp-developer] Here Be Bounties

2003-12-14 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Since it talks specifically about GIMP python, which me, by chance, was trying for the very first time in gimp 1.3 (no kidding --- I've been on gimp 1.2 with my python fu stuff so far), it is interesting to mention that as of now gimpImage neither gimp.pdb.gimp_image_new seens to be working. Th

Re: [Gimp-developer] Here Be Bounties

2003-12-14 Thread David Neary
Hi, That reminds me of some mail I got from a guy who also proposed prizes for GIMP functionality. I believe that he mailed to the list, he also posted on Usenet a few times. As a point of interest, what should we do when this kind of thing happens? Debate the features, decide which we'd like to

[Gimp-developer] Here Be Bounties

2003-12-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I'd like to draw your attention to this URL: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/bounty.html Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] Re: cvs : gimpmiscui.h has gone

2003-12-14 Thread David Odin
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 02:26:03PM +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot compile the cvs as libgimp/gimpmiscui.h has gone .. > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 > -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/ > gtk-2

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread Manish Singh
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 04:57:15PM +, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > But I don't think the actual time it takes to run gcc is what annoys > people most when building stuff that uses auto*/libtool on > Windows. For me, the most annoying part is libtool. This shell-script > is mind-bogglingly slow. Runni

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread Manish Singh
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:13:30PM +, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Roger Leigh writes: > > They both have to implement fork() using Windows calls though, > > which can never be efficient. > > (Just rambling here:) > > I wonder, could the typical fork() immeditaly followed by exec() (in > the chil

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Roger Leigh writes: > MSYS does not depend on cygwin, BTW. It's entirely standalone. MSYS is a *fork* (version) of Cygwin. As the mingw FAQ says, "The POSIX layer used by MSYS is a fork of the 1.3.3 version of Cygwin". (But maybe that was what you meant.) > They both have to implement fork() u

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Adam D. Moss writes: > The only thing I can think of would be if the > //etc headers that get pulled into just about > every file on a win32 build expand into monsterous evil and add > measurably to the unit compilation time. Well, that probably is the reason. *is* quite large. But none of t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread Roger Leigh
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes: > >> which is a severe shortcoming of the build environment (AFAIK, Msys >> uses cygwin which is awfully slow due to a large number of >> reasons). MSYS does not depend on cygwin, BTW. It's ent

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread pcg
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 01:08:20PM +, "Adam D. Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a data point, I use a (optimized build) mingw cross-compiler > hosted on linux, and the raw compilation itself takes a lot longer > (50% longer, or more) than the same compiler version built That's interesting

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread pcg
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:46:54PM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This sounds like if you had a clue on what is causing the slowliness > of running configure on Cygnus. The biggest reason is very slow fork(), followed by extremely slow select(), filehandle operations, pipes and m

Re: [Gimp-developer] cvs : gimpmiscui.h has gone

2003-12-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I cannot compile the cvs as libgimp/gimpmiscui.h has gone .. This has been fixed in CVS already but probably the anoncvs server hasn't caught up yet. Simply remove the inclusion of gimpmiscui.h from libgimp/gimpui.h. Sven

[Gimp-developer] cvs : gimpmiscui.h has gone

2003-12-14 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Hi, I cannot compile the cvs as libgimp/gimpmiscui.h has gone .. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/ gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/ usr/include/freetype2 -

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread Adam D. Moss
Sven Neumann wrote: which is a severe shortcoming of the build environment (AFAIK, Msys uses cygwin which is awfully slow due to a large number of reasons). This sounds like if you had a clue on what is causing the slowliness of running configure on Cygnus. I recently compiled the Blinkenlights so

Re: [Gimp-developer] Displaying image using GTK

2003-12-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes: > which is a severe shortcoming of the build environment (AFAIK, Msys > uses cygwin which is awfully slow due to a large number of > reasons). This sounds like if you had a clue on what is causing the slowliness of running configure on Cygn